Etnokulturna dualnost i etnički stereotipi
Ethno-cultural duality and, ethnic, stereotypes
Апстракт
U dualnim etnokulturnim sredinama postupak konstrukcije individualnog identiteta često se zasniva na poklapanju etničke askripcije i deskripcije, odnosno na stavu da je etnički identitet primarna čovekova odrednica. Osnovni etnički stereotip u takvim zajednicama polazi od predstava da se lokalna sociokulturna stvarnost sastoji od dve etnokulturno kompaktne grupe, od kojih su u datom kontekstu samo Oni - zaista - etnokulturno kompaktna grupa. Posledica toga je prisutnije iskazivanje stavova o unutaretničkim razlikama, nego razrađeno stereotipiziranje Drugih. Takvi unutaretnički stereotipi su zasnovani na tzv. zavičajnim klasifikacijama i predstavljaju malu etnografiju ideja o tome od čega je sastavljena svaka lokalna etnička zajednica.
A construction of an individual identity, in dual ethno-cultural environments, is often based on a premise that an ethnic identity is a primary human determinant. In such dual ethno-cultural communities, a basic ethnic stereotype could be called „relational“: it is founded on the concept of „Others/We-group“ distinction, where the Others appear as a main reason for the existence of the We-group members who use the distinction. This stereotype is based on the following premises: the first one says that a local socio-cultural reality contains two solid ethno-cultural groups, whereas the other suggests that in a local context, there exist just „They“ as a solid ethno-cultural group while among „Us“ the solidity is in fact, limited to ethnic affiliation. The consequence of the attitude is pervasive presentation of intra-ethnic differences, more than mere stereotyping of the Others. These stereotypes are based on the so-called „homeland“ classifications and appear to represent a small ethno...graphy of ideas and images on what constitutes and makes a local ethnic community. The stereotypes of this particular kind are more often seen among members of Serbian ethnic group, at least based on a research in two local communities - Bečej and Seleuš. In the two communities, the prevailing attitudes on intra-ethnic differences and the stereotypes developed out of the differences are more numerous and elaborated, based on the „homeland“ classification. This cultural, cognitive process is a consequence of intertwining of two perspectives in understanding of the We-group. The first perspective narrates about the We-group ethnic background, and the second emphasizes the group domicile, that is, it defines the We-group in space. The first perspective is founded, more or less, on indispensable experience of an ethnic identity, while the other perspective is more based on empirical experience; the second perspective is also a creation of a symbolic construction, the same as an image on an ethnic identity per se.
Кључне речи:
stereotipi / kulturna kognitivnost / intuitivne teorije / etnokulturna dualnost / etnički i kulturni identitet / stereotypes / intuitive theories / ethno-cultural duality / ethnic and cultural identity / cultural cognitionИзвор:
Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 2005, 53, 67-81Издавач:
- Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd
Институција/група
Etnologija i antropologija / Ethnology and AnthropologyTY - JOUR AU - Žikić, Bojan PY - 2005 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/499 AB - U dualnim etnokulturnim sredinama postupak konstrukcije individualnog identiteta često se zasniva na poklapanju etničke askripcije i deskripcije, odnosno na stavu da je etnički identitet primarna čovekova odrednica. Osnovni etnički stereotip u takvim zajednicama polazi od predstava da se lokalna sociokulturna stvarnost sastoji od dve etnokulturno kompaktne grupe, od kojih su u datom kontekstu samo Oni - zaista - etnokulturno kompaktna grupa. Posledica toga je prisutnije iskazivanje stavova o unutaretničkim razlikama, nego razrađeno stereotipiziranje Drugih. Takvi unutaretnički stereotipi su zasnovani na tzv. zavičajnim klasifikacijama i predstavljaju malu etnografiju ideja o tome od čega je sastavljena svaka lokalna etnička zajednica. AB - A construction of an individual identity, in dual ethno-cultural environments, is often based on a premise that an ethnic identity is a primary human determinant. In such dual ethno-cultural communities, a basic ethnic stereotype could be called „relational“: it is founded on the concept of „Others/We-group“ distinction, where the Others appear as a main reason for the existence of the We-group members who use the distinction. This stereotype is based on the following premises: the first one says that a local socio-cultural reality contains two solid ethno-cultural groups, whereas the other suggests that in a local context, there exist just „They“ as a solid ethno-cultural group while among „Us“ the solidity is in fact, limited to ethnic affiliation. The consequence of the attitude is pervasive presentation of intra-ethnic differences, more than mere stereotyping of the Others. These stereotypes are based on the so-called „homeland“ classifications and appear to represent a small ethnography of ideas and images on what constitutes and makes a local ethnic community. The stereotypes of this particular kind are more often seen among members of Serbian ethnic group, at least based on a research in two local communities - Bečej and Seleuš. In the two communities, the prevailing attitudes on intra-ethnic differences and the stereotypes developed out of the differences are more numerous and elaborated, based on the „homeland“ classification. This cultural, cognitive process is a consequence of intertwining of two perspectives in understanding of the We-group. The first perspective narrates about the We-group ethnic background, and the second emphasizes the group domicile, that is, it defines the We-group in space. The first perspective is founded, more or less, on indispensable experience of an ethnic identity, while the other perspective is more based on empirical experience; the second perspective is also a creation of a symbolic construction, the same as an image on an ethnic identity per se. PB - Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd T2 - Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU T1 - Etnokulturna dualnost i etnički stereotipi T1 - Ethno-cultural duality and, ethnic, stereotypes EP - 81 IS - 53 SP - 67 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_499 ER -
@article{ author = "Žikić, Bojan", year = "2005", abstract = "U dualnim etnokulturnim sredinama postupak konstrukcije individualnog identiteta često se zasniva na poklapanju etničke askripcije i deskripcije, odnosno na stavu da je etnički identitet primarna čovekova odrednica. Osnovni etnički stereotip u takvim zajednicama polazi od predstava da se lokalna sociokulturna stvarnost sastoji od dve etnokulturno kompaktne grupe, od kojih su u datom kontekstu samo Oni - zaista - etnokulturno kompaktna grupa. Posledica toga je prisutnije iskazivanje stavova o unutaretničkim razlikama, nego razrađeno stereotipiziranje Drugih. Takvi unutaretnički stereotipi su zasnovani na tzv. zavičajnim klasifikacijama i predstavljaju malu etnografiju ideja o tome od čega je sastavljena svaka lokalna etnička zajednica., A construction of an individual identity, in dual ethno-cultural environments, is often based on a premise that an ethnic identity is a primary human determinant. In such dual ethno-cultural communities, a basic ethnic stereotype could be called „relational“: it is founded on the concept of „Others/We-group“ distinction, where the Others appear as a main reason for the existence of the We-group members who use the distinction. This stereotype is based on the following premises: the first one says that a local socio-cultural reality contains two solid ethno-cultural groups, whereas the other suggests that in a local context, there exist just „They“ as a solid ethno-cultural group while among „Us“ the solidity is in fact, limited to ethnic affiliation. The consequence of the attitude is pervasive presentation of intra-ethnic differences, more than mere stereotyping of the Others. These stereotypes are based on the so-called „homeland“ classifications and appear to represent a small ethnography of ideas and images on what constitutes and makes a local ethnic community. The stereotypes of this particular kind are more often seen among members of Serbian ethnic group, at least based on a research in two local communities - Bečej and Seleuš. In the two communities, the prevailing attitudes on intra-ethnic differences and the stereotypes developed out of the differences are more numerous and elaborated, based on the „homeland“ classification. This cultural, cognitive process is a consequence of intertwining of two perspectives in understanding of the We-group. The first perspective narrates about the We-group ethnic background, and the second emphasizes the group domicile, that is, it defines the We-group in space. The first perspective is founded, more or less, on indispensable experience of an ethnic identity, while the other perspective is more based on empirical experience; the second perspective is also a creation of a symbolic construction, the same as an image on an ethnic identity per se.", publisher = "Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd", journal = "Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU", title = "Etnokulturna dualnost i etnički stereotipi, Ethno-cultural duality and, ethnic, stereotypes", pages = "81-67", number = "53", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_499" }
Žikić, B.. (2005). Etnokulturna dualnost i etnički stereotipi. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd.(53), 67-81. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_499
Žikić B. Etnokulturna dualnost i etnički stereotipi. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU. 2005;(53):67-81. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_499 .
Žikić, Bojan, "Etnokulturna dualnost i etnički stereotipi" in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, no. 53 (2005):67-81, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_499 .