Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu

dc.contributorPedović, Ivana
dc.contributorStojadinović, Miloš
dc.creatorJošić, Smiljana
dc.creatorVidenović, Marina
dc.creatorKrstić, Ksenija
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-05T15:01:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-16T12:28:00Z
dc.date.available2023-10-05T15:01:21Z
dc.date.available2023-10-16T12:28:00Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.isbn978-86-7379-629-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://ipir.ipisr.org.rs/handle/123456789/965
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4994
dc.description.abstractPeer Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) can positively influence learning anddevelopment, in different domains and at different levels of education. Studying collaborationamong adolescents is relevant for educational practice since it helps identify the conditions underwhich collaboration might be productive as well as the ways teachers could support students’ CPSin education. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and systematize research findingson training and scaffolding modalities enabling adolescents to engage in productive CPS. FollowingPRISMA guidelines we searched PsycInfo, WoS and ERIC databases and selected 5256 publishedabstracts in English. Six researchers screened the titles and abstracts of all identified papers (2researchers per abstract) and selected 160 fully published papers for reflexive thematic analyses.Among 160 selected papers, there were 110 provided data on adult scaffolding or the contributionof teacher/researcher support. The results revealed that the quality of cooperation training itselfwas described in 17 papers (15.4%), while scaffolding was a much more common topic in theselected research (N = 78; 70.9%). We also selected papers that included both training andscaffolding (N = 13; 11.8%). Regarding the impact of this kind of support on collaborative problemsolving, the majority of published papers reported positive effects (N = 60, 53.6%) and only a fewof them found its effects to be negative (N = 7, 6.3%). The remaining 44 papers (40%) did notanalyse an impact of training or scaffolding. Our thematic analyses found that in efforts tocontribute to successful CPS, adults (teachers/researchers) can moderate peer interaction in threeways, by focusing on either cognitive processes (N = 82; 75%), group discussions (N = 73; 66%), orclassroom management (N = 23; 21%). All characteristics that emerged in this review will bediscussed and concluding remarks will be focused on educational implications.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherNiš : Faculty of Philosophysr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceInternational conference days of applied psychologysr
dc.subjectadolescencesr
dc.subjectcollaborative learningsr
dc.subjectcollaborative problem solvingsr
dc.subjectscaffolding of peer collaborationsr
dc.titleScaffolding peer collaborative problem solving: a qualitative systematic reviewsr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dc.citation.epage63
dc.citation.spage63
dc.citation.volume19
dc.description.otherBook of abstract:19th International Conference DAYS OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY 2023; Transformative Processes in Society, Environment, Organization, and Mental Health Practicesr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/12276/DAP2023-BoA_1-8,63,97.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_ipir_965
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr
dc.identifier.cobiss125959177


Dokumenti

Thumbnail

Ovaj dokument se pojavljuje u sledećim kolekcijama

Prikaz osnovnih podataka o dokumentu