Uprkos tome što je Hjum s pravom smatran antireligioznim piscem, zaključni Filonov govor Dijaloga o prirodnoj religiji sadrži jedno od najupečatljivih ispovedanja hrišćanskog fideizma u istoriji religiozne misli. U ovom tekstu istražujući Hjumovo shvatanje odnosa između religiozne vere i pironizma, kao i principijelne afinitete između fideizma i filozofskog skepticizma objašnjavam kako je do toga moglo da dođe. Hjumovo lično stanovište, koje se razlikuje od Filonovog, možemo rekonstruisati ako pažljivije razmotrimo njegov odgovor na takozvani argument na osnovu pariteta.
Despite the fact that Hume is rightfully considered to be an antireligious writer, the concluding Filo's speech in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion contains one of the most striking proclamations of Christian fideism in the history of religious thought. In this paper, by investigating Hume's account of the relationship between religious faith and pyrrhonism, and the principal affinities between fideism and philosophical skepticism, I attempt to explain how could this happen. Hume's personal standpoint, which is different than Filo's, may be reconstructed by careful examination of the so called parity argument.
TY - JOUR
AU - Bogdanovski, Mašan
PY - 2006
UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/578
AB - Uprkos tome što je Hjum s pravom smatran antireligioznim piscem, zaključni Filonov govor Dijaloga o prirodnoj religiji sadrži jedno od najupečatljivih ispovedanja hrišćanskog fideizma u istoriji religiozne misli. U ovom tekstu istražujući Hjumovo shvatanje odnosa između religiozne vere i pironizma, kao i principijelne afinitete između fideizma i filozofskog skepticizma objašnjavam kako je do toga moglo da dođe. Hjumovo lično stanovište, koje se razlikuje od Filonovog, možemo rekonstruisati ako pažljivije razmotrimo njegov odgovor na takozvani argument na osnovu pariteta.
AB - Despite the fact that Hume is rightfully considered to be an antireligious writer, the concluding Filo's speech in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion contains one of the most striking proclamations of Christian fideism in the history of religious thought. In this paper, by investigating Hume's account of the relationship between religious faith and pyrrhonism, and the principal affinities between fideism and philosophical skepticism, I attempt to explain how could this happen. Hume's personal standpoint, which is different than Filo's, may be reconstructed by careful examination of the so called parity argument.
PB - Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd
T2 - Theoria
T1 - Skeptički fideizam u Hjumovim Dijalozima o prirodnoj religiji
T1 - Skeptical fideism in Hume's Dialogues concerning natural religion
EP - 92
IS - 4
SP - 71
VL - 49
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_578
ER -
@article{
author = "Bogdanovski, Mašan",
year = "2006",
abstract = "Uprkos tome što je Hjum s pravom smatran antireligioznim piscem, zaključni Filonov govor Dijaloga o prirodnoj religiji sadrži jedno od najupečatljivih ispovedanja hrišćanskog fideizma u istoriji religiozne misli. U ovom tekstu istražujući Hjumovo shvatanje odnosa između religiozne vere i pironizma, kao i principijelne afinitete između fideizma i filozofskog skepticizma objašnjavam kako je do toga moglo da dođe. Hjumovo lično stanovište, koje se razlikuje od Filonovog, možemo rekonstruisati ako pažljivije razmotrimo njegov odgovor na takozvani argument na osnovu pariteta., Despite the fact that Hume is rightfully considered to be an antireligious writer, the concluding Filo's speech in the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion contains one of the most striking proclamations of Christian fideism in the history of religious thought. In this paper, by investigating Hume's account of the relationship between religious faith and pyrrhonism, and the principal affinities between fideism and philosophical skepticism, I attempt to explain how could this happen. Hume's personal standpoint, which is different than Filo's, may be reconstructed by careful examination of the so called parity argument.",
publisher = "Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Skeptički fideizam u Hjumovim Dijalozima o prirodnoj religiji, Skeptical fideism in Hume's Dialogues concerning natural religion",
pages = "92-71",
number = "4",
volume = "49",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_578"
}
Bogdanovski, M.. (2006). Skeptički fideizam u Hjumovim Dijalozima o prirodnoj religiji. in Theoria
Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd., 49(4), 71-92.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_578
Bogdanovski M. Skeptički fideizam u Hjumovim Dijalozima o prirodnoj religiji. in Theoria. 2006;49(4):71-92.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_578 .
Bogdanovski, Mašan, "Skeptički fideizam u Hjumovim Dijalozima o prirodnoj religiji" in Theoria, 49, no. 4 (2006):71-92,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_578 .
