REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Sociologija / Sociology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za sociologiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Sociologija / Sociology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za sociologiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

U odbranu Parsonsovog shvatanja moći

In defense of Parsons' power conception

Thumbnail
2006
620.pdf (412.4Kb)
Authors
Antonić, Slobodan
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Moć je za Parsonsa uopštena sposobnost da se obezbedi izvršavanje važećih obaveza od strane jedinica u sistemu kolektivne organizacije, gde se te obaveze legitimizuju pozivanjem na njihovu vezu sa kolektivnim ciljevima. Moć se, dakle, odigrava u okviru sklopa normi. Norme su u osnovi ne samo svakog odigravanja moći, već i svakog društvenog usmeravanja. Moć nije konfliktni mehanizam koji stoji naspram društvenog poretka, već je upravo omogućena i ograničena samim društvenim poretkom koji sadrži njenu normativnu osnovu. Pretnju prunudnim merama ili prisilom bez legitimizacije ili opravdanja, po Parsonsu, ne bi uopšte trebalo nazivati upotrebom moći: to je graničan slučaj gde moć, gubeći svoj simbolički karakter prelazi u suštinski instrumentalnu pojavu obezbeđivanja povinovanja željama, a ne obavezama. Parsonsova predstava o moći, takođe, ne podrazumeva igru "nultog zbira" u kojoj samo neki dobijaju na uštrb drugih. Naprotiv, on je nastojao da pokaže kako moć doprinosi opštem usavršavanj...u poretka i građanske dobrobiti.

In Parsons` opinion, power is generalized capacity to secure the performance of binding obligations by units in a system of collective organization when the obligations are legitimized with reference to their bearing on collective goals. Power is exercised within the context of norms. Norms are at the root not only of all exercise of power but of all social conduct. Power, rather than being a conflictual mechanism which is opposed to social order, is both enabled by and constrained within that social order because of its normative basis. The threat of coercive measures, or of compulsion, without legitimation or justification, according to Parsons, should not properly be called the use of power at all, but is the limiting case where power, losing its symbolic character, merges into an intrinsic instrumentality of securing compliance with wishes, rather than obligations. Parsons` conception of power also was not to be a "zero-sum" game in which one could only ever win at the expense of a...nother. On the contrary, he sought to show how power contributed to the general accomplished of order and civility.

Keywords:
prinuda / nasilje / moć / legitimitet / autoritet / violence / power / legitimation / coercion / authority
Source:
Sociološki pregled, 2006, 40, 1, 57-79
Publisher:
  • Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Društveni akteri i društvene promene u Srbiji 1990-2010. godine (RS-149005)

DOI: 10.5937/socpreg0601057A

ISSN: 0085-6320

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/623
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za sociologiju
Institution/Community
Sociologija / Sociology
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Antonić, Slobodan
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/623
AB  - Moć je za Parsonsa uopštena sposobnost da se obezbedi izvršavanje važećih obaveza od strane jedinica u sistemu kolektivne organizacije, gde se te obaveze legitimizuju pozivanjem na njihovu vezu sa kolektivnim ciljevima. Moć se, dakle, odigrava u okviru sklopa normi. Norme su u osnovi ne samo svakog odigravanja moći, već i svakog društvenog usmeravanja. Moć nije konfliktni mehanizam koji stoji naspram društvenog poretka, već je upravo omogućena i ograničena samim društvenim poretkom koji sadrži njenu normativnu osnovu. Pretnju prunudnim merama ili prisilom bez legitimizacije ili opravdanja, po Parsonsu, ne bi uopšte trebalo nazivati upotrebom moći: to je graničan slučaj gde moć, gubeći svoj simbolički karakter prelazi u suštinski instrumentalnu pojavu obezbeđivanja povinovanja željama, a ne obavezama. Parsonsova predstava o moći, takođe, ne podrazumeva igru "nultog zbira" u kojoj samo neki dobijaju na uštrb drugih. Naprotiv, on je nastojao da pokaže kako moć doprinosi opštem usavršavanju poretka i građanske dobrobiti.
AB  - In Parsons` opinion, power is generalized capacity to secure the performance of binding obligations by units in a system of collective organization when the obligations are legitimized with reference to their bearing on collective goals. Power is exercised within the context of norms. Norms are at the root not only of all exercise of power but of all social conduct. Power, rather than being a conflictual mechanism which is opposed to social order, is both enabled by and constrained within that social order because of its normative basis. The threat of coercive measures, or of compulsion, without legitimation or justification, according to Parsons, should not properly be called the use of power at all, but is the limiting case where power, losing its symbolic character, merges into an intrinsic instrumentality of securing compliance with wishes, rather than obligations. Parsons` conception of power also was not to be a "zero-sum" game in which one could only ever win at the expense of another. On the contrary, he sought to show how power contributed to the general accomplished of order and civility.
PB  - Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Sociološki pregled
T1  - U odbranu Parsonsovog shvatanja moći
T1  - In defense of Parsons' power conception
EP  - 79
IS  - 1
SP  - 57
VL  - 40
DO  - 10.5937/socpreg0601057A
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Antonić, Slobodan",
year = "2006",
abstract = "Moć je za Parsonsa uopštena sposobnost da se obezbedi izvršavanje važećih obaveza od strane jedinica u sistemu kolektivne organizacije, gde se te obaveze legitimizuju pozivanjem na njihovu vezu sa kolektivnim ciljevima. Moć se, dakle, odigrava u okviru sklopa normi. Norme su u osnovi ne samo svakog odigravanja moći, već i svakog društvenog usmeravanja. Moć nije konfliktni mehanizam koji stoji naspram društvenog poretka, već je upravo omogućena i ograničena samim društvenim poretkom koji sadrži njenu normativnu osnovu. Pretnju prunudnim merama ili prisilom bez legitimizacije ili opravdanja, po Parsonsu, ne bi uopšte trebalo nazivati upotrebom moći: to je graničan slučaj gde moć, gubeći svoj simbolički karakter prelazi u suštinski instrumentalnu pojavu obezbeđivanja povinovanja željama, a ne obavezama. Parsonsova predstava o moći, takođe, ne podrazumeva igru "nultog zbira" u kojoj samo neki dobijaju na uštrb drugih. Naprotiv, on je nastojao da pokaže kako moć doprinosi opštem usavršavanju poretka i građanske dobrobiti., In Parsons` opinion, power is generalized capacity to secure the performance of binding obligations by units in a system of collective organization when the obligations are legitimized with reference to their bearing on collective goals. Power is exercised within the context of norms. Norms are at the root not only of all exercise of power but of all social conduct. Power, rather than being a conflictual mechanism which is opposed to social order, is both enabled by and constrained within that social order because of its normative basis. The threat of coercive measures, or of compulsion, without legitimation or justification, according to Parsons, should not properly be called the use of power at all, but is the limiting case where power, losing its symbolic character, merges into an intrinsic instrumentality of securing compliance with wishes, rather than obligations. Parsons` conception of power also was not to be a "zero-sum" game in which one could only ever win at the expense of another. On the contrary, he sought to show how power contributed to the general accomplished of order and civility.",
publisher = "Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Sociološki pregled",
title = "U odbranu Parsonsovog shvatanja moći, In defense of Parsons' power conception",
pages = "79-57",
number = "1",
volume = "40",
doi = "10.5937/socpreg0601057A"
}
Antonić, S.. (2006). U odbranu Parsonsovog shvatanja moći. in Sociološki pregled
Sociološko društvo Srbije, Beograd., 40(1), 57-79.
https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg0601057A
Antonić S. U odbranu Parsonsovog shvatanja moći. in Sociološki pregled. 2006;40(1):57-79.
doi:10.5937/socpreg0601057A .
Antonić, Slobodan, "U odbranu Parsonsovog shvatanja moći" in Sociološki pregled, 40, no. 1 (2006):57-79,
https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg0601057A . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB