REFF - Faculty of Philosophy Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   REFF
  • Psihologija / Psychology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za psihologiju
  • View Item
  •   REFF
  • Psihologija / Psychology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za psihologiju
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Implicit vs. Explicit learning in German noun plurals

Thumbnail
2008
800.pdf (329.6Kb)
Authors
Ković, Vanja
Westermann, Gert
Plunkett, Kim
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Over the past few decades there has been a lot of debate, about language learning and the opinion about the status of mental rule during the process of language learning is still divided between different researches. The present study examines learning morphology of German noun plurals based on rules, examples or on both, rules and examples. The results across these three experimental conditions suggest that the morphological patterns are learned more easily in the form of rules and thus, seem to be more easily captured by dual-route (which suggest that rules and exceptions are processed by two qualitatively different mechanisms) than single route theories (which suggest a singe mechanism for processing both rules and exceptions). However, a closer examination of error patterns across the five rules (-e, -n, -er, circle divide, -s) revealed results confronting dual-route theories and suggest the existence of two rule-mechanisms (-n and -s) rather than one for learning regular inflectio...n in German plural nouns. Moreover, the second rule (with plural ending -n) was the easiest one to be learned, although it is the fifth rule (with plural ending -s) which is considered as a default rule in German.

Keywords:
plural inflection / learning / German / dual-route theories / connectionist theories
Source:
Psihologija, 2008, 41, 4, 387-411
Publisher:
  • Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd

DOI: 10.2298/PSI0804387K

ISSN: 0048-5705

WoS: 000262123600001

Scopus: 2-s2.0-77955819296
[ Google Scholar ]
2
2
URI
http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/803
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researcher's publications - Odeljenje za psihologiju
Institution/Community
Psihologija / Psychology
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ković, Vanja
AU  - Westermann, Gert
AU  - Plunkett, Kim
PY  - 2008
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/803
AB  - Over the past few decades there has been a lot of debate, about language learning and the opinion about the status of mental rule during the process of language learning is still divided between different researches. The present study examines learning morphology of German noun plurals based on rules, examples or on both, rules and examples. The results across these three experimental conditions suggest that the morphological patterns are learned more easily in the form of rules and thus, seem to be more easily captured by dual-route (which suggest that rules and exceptions are processed by two qualitatively different mechanisms) than single route theories (which suggest a singe mechanism for processing both rules and exceptions). However, a closer examination of error patterns across the five rules (-e, -n, -er, circle divide, -s) revealed results confronting dual-route theories and suggest the existence of two rule-mechanisms (-n and -s) rather than one for learning regular inflection in German plural nouns. Moreover, the second rule (with plural ending -n) was the easiest one to be learned, although it is the fifth rule (with plural ending -s) which is considered as a default rule in German.
PB  - Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Psihologija
T1  - Implicit vs. Explicit learning in German noun plurals
EP  - 411
IS  - 4
SP  - 387
VL  - 41
DO  - 10.2298/PSI0804387K
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Ković, Vanja and Westermann, Gert and Plunkett, Kim",
year = "2008",
abstract = "Over the past few decades there has been a lot of debate, about language learning and the opinion about the status of mental rule during the process of language learning is still divided between different researches. The present study examines learning morphology of German noun plurals based on rules, examples or on both, rules and examples. The results across these three experimental conditions suggest that the morphological patterns are learned more easily in the form of rules and thus, seem to be more easily captured by dual-route (which suggest that rules and exceptions are processed by two qualitatively different mechanisms) than single route theories (which suggest a singe mechanism for processing both rules and exceptions). However, a closer examination of error patterns across the five rules (-e, -n, -er, circle divide, -s) revealed results confronting dual-route theories and suggest the existence of two rule-mechanisms (-n and -s) rather than one for learning regular inflection in German plural nouns. Moreover, the second rule (with plural ending -n) was the easiest one to be learned, although it is the fifth rule (with plural ending -s) which is considered as a default rule in German.",
publisher = "Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Psihologija",
title = "Implicit vs. Explicit learning in German noun plurals",
pages = "411-387",
number = "4",
volume = "41",
doi = "10.2298/PSI0804387K"
}
Ković, V., Westermann, G.,& Plunkett, K.. (2008). Implicit vs. Explicit learning in German noun plurals. in Psihologija
Društvo psihologa Srbije, Beograd., 41(4), 387-411.
https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI0804387K
Ković V, Westermann G, Plunkett K. Implicit vs. Explicit learning in German noun plurals. in Psihologija. 2008;41(4):387-411.
doi:10.2298/PSI0804387K .
Ković, Vanja, Westermann, Gert, Plunkett, Kim, "Implicit vs. Explicit learning in German noun plurals" in Psihologija, 41, no. 4 (2008):387-411,
https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI0804387K . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About REFF | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB