Приказ основних података о документу
Realizam i zaključak na najbolje objašnjenje
Realism and the inference to the best explanation
dc.creator | Zorić, Aleksandra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-12T10:59:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-12T10:59:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0351-2274 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/911 | |
dc.description.abstract | Najpoznatiji argument u prilog realizma glasi da je objašnjenje uspeha nauke moguće samo ako prihvatimo realističku perspektivu. Reč je o zaključku na najbolje objašnjenje, odnosno, argumentu 'nema čuda'. Predmet ovog rada je analiza ovog argumenta, kao i najznačajnijih antirealističkih prigovora. Pokazaćemo da iako ovi prigovori imaju izvesnu težinu, oni ne predstavljaju suštinski problem za realističku poziciju. | sr |
dc.description.abstract | The well known argument for realism is that the explanation of the success of science is possible only on grounds of one's acceptance of realist stance. The argument in question is the so-called inference to the best explanation or 'no miracles' argument. The aim of this work is to analyze this argument as well as the most important antirealist objections to it. We will show that although these objections carry certain weight, nonetheless they fail to present an essential obstacle for the realist position. | en |
dc.publisher | Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.source | Theoria | |
dc.subject | zaključak na najbolje objašnjenje | sr |
dc.subject | uspeh | sr |
dc.subject | referencija | sr |
dc.subject | realizam | sr |
dc.subject | istinitost | sr |
dc.subject | indukcija | sr |
dc.subject | antirealizam | sr |
dc.subject | truth | en |
dc.subject | success | en |
dc.subject | reference | en |
dc.subject | realism | en |
dc.subject | inference to the best explanation | en |
dc.subject | induction | en |
dc.subject | antirealism | en |
dc.title | Realizam i zaključak na najbolje objašnjenje | sr |
dc.title | Realism and the inference to the best explanation | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | ARR | |
dc.citation.epage | 52 | |
dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
dc.citation.other | 52(2): 37-52 | |
dc.citation.rank | M24 | |
dc.citation.spage | 37 | |
dc.citation.volume | 52 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2433/908.pdf | |
dc.identifier.rcub | https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_911 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |