Tri paradoksa

Three paradoxes

dc.creator	Đorđević, Vladan
dc.date.accessioned	2021-10-12T10:59:44Z
dc.date.available	2021-10-12T10:59:44Z
dc.date.issued	2009
dc.identifier.issn	0351-2274
dc.identifier.uri	http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/912
dc.description.abstract	Mada na prvi pogled izgleda da tri paradoksa kojima ću se ovde baviti nemaju ništa bitno zajedničko, smatram da sva tri sadrže skrivenu dvosmislenost iste vrste, i na osnovu toga nudim rešenje. Prvi je poznat u literaturi kao 'direktni argument', drugi je jedan od standardnih argumenata za fatalizam a treći je Mekgijev kontraprimer za modus ponens.	sr
dc.description.abstract	Although it may seem that the three paradoxes I deal with in this paper have nothing in common, I believe that they all involve an equivocation of the same kind. The first is known as the 'direct argument', the second is one of the standard arguments for fatalism, and the third is McGee's counterexample to modus poenes.	en
dc.publisher	Srpsko filozofsko društvo, Beograd
dc.rights	openAccess
dc.source	Theoria
dc.title	Tri paradoksa	sr
dc.title	Three paradoxes	en
dc.type	article
dc.rights.license	ARR
dc.citation.epage	16
dc.citation.issue	3
dc.citation.other	52(3): 5-16
dc.citation.rank	M24
dc.citation.spage	5
dc.citation.volume	52
dc.identifier.fulltext	http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/2434/909.pdf
dc.identifier.rcub	https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_912
dc.type.version	publishedVersion