Wittgenstein, Religious Belief, and Incommensurability
Wittgenstein, religiozno vjerovanje i nesumjerljivost
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Wittgenstein begins his Lectures on Religious Belief by saying that he would not contradict a religious person’s belief in the Last Judgement, even though he personally does not share such beliefs. Later, he expresses uncertainty about whether religious believers and non–believers truly understand each other. Some philosophers interpret these remarks as showing that Wittgenstein thought that the religious and the non–religious discourse are incommensurable, in the sense that a non–religious person cannot understand a religious person when they are talking about their beliefs, and that religious beliefs are immune to outside criticism as a consequence of the supposed incommensurability. Hilary Putnam claimed that Wittgenstein believed that the dialogue between religious and non–religious individuals involves talking past each other, not due to incommensurability but for other reasons. I propose an alternative perspective on the “no contradiction situation” and Wittgenstein’s stance on r...eligious belief, while agreeing with Putnam that the incommensurability thesis cannot be attributed to Wittgenstein.
Keywords:
Hilary Putnam / incommensurability / Ludwig Wittgenstein / religious beliefSource:
Disputatio Philosophica, 2023, 25, 1, 37-49Publisher:
- Fakultet filozofije i religijskih znanosti, Jordanovac 110, Zagreb
Funding / projects:
- 451–03–47/2023–01/20016
- Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, institutional funding - 200163 (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy) (RS-MESTD-inst-2020-200163)
Institution/Community
Filozofija / PhilosophyTY - JOUR AU - Stamenković, Nikola PY - 2023 UR - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6273 AB - Wittgenstein begins his Lectures on Religious Belief by saying that he would not contradict a religious person’s belief in the Last Judgement, even though he personally does not share such beliefs. Later, he expresses uncertainty about whether religious believers and non–believers truly understand each other. Some philosophers interpret these remarks as showing that Wittgenstein thought that the religious and the non–religious discourse are incommensurable, in the sense that a non–religious person cannot understand a religious person when they are talking about their beliefs, and that religious beliefs are immune to outside criticism as a consequence of the supposed incommensurability. Hilary Putnam claimed that Wittgenstein believed that the dialogue between religious and non–religious individuals involves talking past each other, not due to incommensurability but for other reasons. I propose an alternative perspective on the “no contradiction situation” and Wittgenstein’s stance on religious belief, while agreeing with Putnam that the incommensurability thesis cannot be attributed to Wittgenstein. PB - Fakultet filozofije i religijskih znanosti, Jordanovac 110, Zagreb T2 - Disputatio Philosophica T1 - Wittgenstein, Religious Belief, and Incommensurability T1 - Wittgenstein, religiozno vjerovanje i nesumjerljivost EP - 49 IS - 1 SP - 37 VL - 25 DO - 10.32701/dp.25.1.3 ER -
@article{ author = "Stamenković, Nikola", year = "2023", abstract = "Wittgenstein begins his Lectures on Religious Belief by saying that he would not contradict a religious person’s belief in the Last Judgement, even though he personally does not share such beliefs. Later, he expresses uncertainty about whether religious believers and non–believers truly understand each other. Some philosophers interpret these remarks as showing that Wittgenstein thought that the religious and the non–religious discourse are incommensurable, in the sense that a non–religious person cannot understand a religious person when they are talking about their beliefs, and that religious beliefs are immune to outside criticism as a consequence of the supposed incommensurability. Hilary Putnam claimed that Wittgenstein believed that the dialogue between religious and non–religious individuals involves talking past each other, not due to incommensurability but for other reasons. I propose an alternative perspective on the “no contradiction situation” and Wittgenstein’s stance on religious belief, while agreeing with Putnam that the incommensurability thesis cannot be attributed to Wittgenstein.", publisher = "Fakultet filozofije i religijskih znanosti, Jordanovac 110, Zagreb", journal = "Disputatio Philosophica", title = "Wittgenstein, Religious Belief, and Incommensurability, Wittgenstein, religiozno vjerovanje i nesumjerljivost", pages = "49-37", number = "1", volume = "25", doi = "10.32701/dp.25.1.3" }
Stamenković, N.. (2023). Wittgenstein, Religious Belief, and Incommensurability. in Disputatio Philosophica Fakultet filozofije i religijskih znanosti, Jordanovac 110, Zagreb., 25(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.25.1.3
Stamenković N. Wittgenstein, Religious Belief, and Incommensurability. in Disputatio Philosophica. 2023;25(1):37-49. doi:10.32701/dp.25.1.3 .
Stamenković, Nikola, "Wittgenstein, Religious Belief, and Incommensurability" in Disputatio Philosophica, 25, no. 1 (2023):37-49, https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.25.1.3 . .