Приказ основних података о документу

Schubert and Beethoven: Adorno's early antipodes of the music in bourgeois epoch

dc.creatorJeremić-Molnar, Dragana
dc.creatorMolnar, Aleksandar
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-12T11:36:33Z
dc.date.available2021-10-12T11:36:33Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn0353-5738
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1493
dc.description.abstractU članku autori rekonstruišu dihotomije koje je mladi Teodor Adorno nastojao da otkrije u muzici građanske epohe i personifikuje ih u dvojici antipoda - Francu Šubertu i Ludvigu van Betovenu. Iako je već tada bio obožavalac Šenberga i muzičkog avangardizma 20. veka, Adorno se u svojim radovima pre egzila iz Nemačke 1934. intenzivno bavio Šubertom i njegovom opozicijom Betovenu. Dok je Betoven bio nepokolebljivi i progresivni revolucionar, fasciniran 'praktičkim umom' i misijom uzdizanja i domašivanja zvezda, Šubert nije hteo ništa od toga (skoro predviđajući neuspeh celokupnog revolucionarnog projekta). Umesto toga, on je gledao unazad, u primordijalnu prirodu i u mogućnost čoveka da participira u njenim mističnim ciklusima smrti i regeneracije. Izostanak sinteze između ove dve tendencije u muzici na početku građanske epohe vodio je 'negativnoj dijalektici' Šenberga i avangardizma 20. veka i konačnom razdvajanju betovenovskog muzičkog napretka i šubertovskog muzičkog mimezisa.sr
dc.description.abstractIn this article the authors are reconstructing the dichotomies which the young Theodor Adorno was trying to detect in the music of the bourgeois epoch and personify in two antipodes - Franz Schubert and Ludwig van Beethoven. Although already a devotee of Arnold Schönberg and the 20th century music avantgardism, Adorno was, in his works prior to his exile from Germany (1934), intensively dealing with Schubert and his opposition towards Beethoven. While Beethoven was a bold and progressive revolutionary, fascinated by the 'practical reason' and the mission to rise up and reach the stars, Schubert wanted none of it (almost anticipating the failure of the whole revolutionary project). Instead, he was looking backwards, to primordial nature and the possibility of man to participate in its mythic cycles of death and regeneration. The lack of synthesis between this two opposing tendencies in the music of early bourgeois epoch lead to the 'negative dialectics' of Schönberg and 20th century music avantgardism and to the final separation of Beethovenian musical progress and Schubertian musical mimesis.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Beogradu - Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/177019/RS//
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/179035/RS//
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceFilozofija i društvo
dc.subjectrevolucijasr
dc.subjectmuzikasr
dc.subjectmimezissr
dc.subjectLudvig van Betovensr
dc.subjectgrađanska epohasr
dc.subjectFranc Šubertsr
dc.subjectArnold Šenbergsr
dc.subjectrevolutionen
dc.subjectmusicen
dc.subjectmimesisen
dc.subjectLudwig van Beethovenen
dc.subjectFranz Schuberten
dc.subjectbourgeois epochen
dc.subjectArnold Schönbergen
dc.titleŠubert i Betoven - Adornovi prvobitni antipodi muzike građanske epohesr
dc.titleSchubert and Beethoven: Adorno's early antipodes of the music in bourgeois epochen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dc.citation.epage236
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other23(3): 221-236
dc.citation.rankM51
dc.citation.spage221
dc.citation.volume23
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/431/1490.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_1493
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу