Show simple item record

Zoran Đinđić: From Anarchist to Barbarogenius

dc.creatorMolnar, Aleksandar
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-22T08:54:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-17T11:40:44Z
dc.date.available2023-12-22T08:54:45Z
dc.date.available2024-04-17T11:40:44Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2683-5959
dc.identifier.urihttp://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/3670
dc.identifier.urihttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6423
dc.description.abstractZoran Đinđić bio je prvi (i do sada jedini) srbijanski premijer sa doktorskom diplomom filozofa i objavljenim knjigama koje su, u celosti ilidelimično, bile posvećene filozofiji politike. Otuda se nameće pitanjeda li je postojao uticaj njegovih ranih filozofskih stavova na kasnijebavljenje politikom. U članku se autor bavi onim što misli da je bioglavni diskontinuitet i glavni kontinuitet u misli Zorana Đinđića. Glavni diskontinuitet pojavio se u oblasti filozofije istorije: u suprotnostisa njegovom ranom kritikom filozofije istorije on je, dok je bio navlasti, formulisao svoju „filozofiju srpske istorije”. Na drugoj strani, ukritici prosvetiteljstva (shvaćenog kao totalitarnog) bio je dosledando kraja svog života. Štaviše, vernost mladalačkom anarhizmu izgleda da je došla do izražaja u poslednjim mesecima Đinđićevog života,kada je počeo da poprima crte Barbarogenija, onako kako ga je svojevremeno opisao Ljubomir Micić.sr
dc.description.abstractZoran Đinđić was the first (and so far only) Serbian prime minister with a PhD in philosophy and publications entirely or partially devoted to the philosophy of politics.Therefore, it is worth asking whether there was any impact of his early philosophicalviews on his later politics. The author is dealing with what he considers to be the maindiscontinuity and the main continuity in Đinđić’s thought. The former one marks thefield of philosophy of history: in contrast to his early critique of philosophy of history,once in power Đinđić formulated his own „philosophy of Serbian history”. The latterone, his critique of Enlightement as totalitarian, proved to be persistent throughouthis life. In the last months of his life Đinđić began to take on the features of a Barbarogenius, as Ljubomir Micić once described himself.sr
dc.language.isosrsr
dc.publisherBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teorijusr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceKritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društvasr
dc.subjectZoran Đinđićsr
dc.subjectnacijasr
dc.subjectnacionalizamsr
dc.subjectfilozofija istorijesr
dc.subjectprosvetiteljstvosr
dc.subjectphilosophy of historysr
dc.subjectenlightenmentsr
dc.subjecttotalitarianismsr
dc.titleZoran Đinđić – od anarhiste do barbarogenijasr
dc.titleZoran Đinđić: From Anarchist to Barbarogeniussr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseBYsr
dc.citation.epage341
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.spage323
dc.citation.volume4
dc.identifier.doi10.5281/zenodo.10206842
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/16715/bitstream_13307.pdf
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record