TY  - CONF
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/EIP23_proceedings.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4927
AB  - To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices this study sought to uncover how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A sample of N = 583 Serbian citizens completed an online questionnaire assessing four TCAM domains: Alternative medical systems (AMS), Natural product-based practices (NP), New Age medicine (NA), and Rituals/Customs (RC). Participants indicated whether they had used a given practice in the past year, and if yes, how they used it. Overall, participants used TCAM preventively in two-thirds of cases, but we also found a significant association between TCAM domain and way of use. AMS was used alternatively more than any other TCAM domain, NP was the most prevalent complementary treatment, while NA and RC were predominantly used preventively. Our results suggest that different domains of TCAM practices may impact people’s health differently, depending on how they are used, which should inform interventions.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd
PB  - Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd
C3  - Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine
EP  - 25
SP  - 22
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Purić, Danka and Opačić, Goran and Petrović, Marija and Knežević, Goran and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Teovanović, Predrag and Zupan, Zorana and Ninković, Milica and Branković, Marija and Živanović, Marko and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices this study sought to uncover how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A sample of N = 583 Serbian citizens completed an online questionnaire assessing four TCAM domains: Alternative medical systems (AMS), Natural product-based practices (NP), New Age medicine (NA), and Rituals/Customs (RC). Participants indicated whether they had used a given practice in the past year, and if yes, how they used it. Overall, participants used TCAM preventively in two-thirds of cases, but we also found a significant association between TCAM domain and way of use. AMS was used alternatively more than any other TCAM domain, NP was the most prevalent complementary treatment, while NA and RC were predominantly used preventively. Our results suggest that different domains of TCAM practices may impact people’s health differently, depending on how they are used, which should inform interventions.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd, Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd",
journal = "Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine",
pages = "25-22",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927"
}

Purić, D., Opačić, G., Petrović, M., Knežević, G., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Lazarević, L. B., Teovanović, P., Zupan, Z., Ninković, M., Branković, M., Živanović, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
Institut za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd., 22-25.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927

Purić D, Opačić G, Petrović M, Knežević G, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Lazarević LB, Teovanović P, Zupan Z, Ninković M, Branković M, Živanović M, Žeželj I. To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2023;:22-25.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927 .

Purić, Danka, Opačić, Goran, Petrović, Marija, Knežević, Goran, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Teovanović, Predrag, Zupan, Zorana, Ninković, Milica, Branković, Marija, Živanović, Marko, Žeželj, Iris, "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine" in Proceedings - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2023):22-25,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4927 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/EIP2023_book_of_abstracts.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4928
AB  - To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices we should first reflect on how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A total of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants from Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 24 TCAM practices, grouped into four domains: Alternative Medical Systems (e.g., acupuncture, homeopathy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal extracts/supplements), New Age medicine (e.g., yoga, mindfulness) and Rituals/Customs (e.g., visiting monasteries for health). Participants who indicated using a certain practice in the past year were asked to consider their most recent experience with that practice and choose only one option for how they used it: for preventive purposes/advancing health, at the same time with official medicine therapy, instead of official medicine therapy. Participants also provided information on whether a TCAM practitioner was involved in their last use of any of the TCAM practices and how often, in general, they consult TCAM practitioners. Overall, 63%, 95%CI [60, 65] of participants used TCAM practices for preventive purposes, 31% [29, 34] in parallel with, and 6% [5, 8] as an alternative to official treatments. Of the four domains of TCAM use, New Age medicine and Rituals/Customs were most frequently used for prevention, with 78% [74, 83] and 77% [72, 82], respectively, while Natural product-based practices were used for prevention in 57% [54, 60] and Alternative Medical Systems in 41% [33, 49] of the cases. Alternative use of TCAM practices was the most common in the case of Alternative Medical Systems (21% [14, 28]), while it amounted to no more than 7% of participants for any of the other domains. For 24% of participants, a TCAM practitioner was present during their last TCAM use, 10% reported a practitioner previously prescribing the practice, while 66% of participants reported no practitioner involvement. The results suggest the importance of treating different domains of TCAM practices separately, as they may have different impacts on people’s health behavior. We especially point to the importance of monitoring adherence to alternative medical systems, as they may potentially distract patients from official therapies and thus further compromise their health.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine
EP  - 56
SP  - 55
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Purić, Danka and Opačić, Goran and Petrović, Marija and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Teovanović, Predrag and Zupan, Zorana and Ninković, Milica and Branković, Marija and Živanović, Marko and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "To understand the reasons behind the trend of growing use of traditional, complementary and alternative (TCAM) practices we should first reflect on how people use them - to prevent disease/promote health, to treat medical conditions by complementing official medical treatments, or as an alternative to them. A total of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants from Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 24 TCAM practices, grouped into four domains: Alternative Medical Systems (e.g., acupuncture, homeopathy), Natural product-based practices (e.g., herbal extracts/supplements), New Age medicine (e.g., yoga, mindfulness) and Rituals/Customs (e.g., visiting monasteries for health). Participants who indicated using a certain practice in the past year were asked to consider their most recent experience with that practice and choose only one option for how they used it: for preventive purposes/advancing health, at the same time with official medicine therapy, instead of official medicine therapy. Participants also provided information on whether a TCAM practitioner was involved in their last use of any of the TCAM practices and how often, in general, they consult TCAM practitioners. Overall, 63%, 95%CI [60, 65] of participants used TCAM practices for preventive purposes, 31% [29, 34] in parallel with, and 6% [5, 8] as an alternative to official treatments. Of the four domains of TCAM use, New Age medicine and Rituals/Customs were most frequently used for prevention, with 78% [74, 83] and 77% [72, 82], respectively, while Natural product-based practices were used for prevention in 57% [54, 60] and Alternative Medical Systems in 41% [33, 49] of the cases. Alternative use of TCAM practices was the most common in the case of Alternative Medical Systems (21% [14, 28]), while it amounted to no more than 7% of participants for any of the other domains. For 24% of participants, a TCAM practitioner was present during their last TCAM use, 10% reported a practitioner previously prescribing the practice, while 66% of participants reported no practitioner involvement. The results suggest the importance of treating different domains of TCAM practices separately, as they may have different impacts on people’s health behavior. We especially point to the importance of monitoring adherence to alternative medical systems, as they may potentially distract patients from official therapies and thus further compromise their health.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine",
pages = "56-55",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928"
}

Purić, D., Opačić, G., Petrović, M., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Lazarević, L. B., Teovanović, P., Zupan, Z., Ninković, M., Branković, M., Živanović, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 55-56.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928

Purić D, Opačić G, Petrović M, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Lazarević LB, Teovanović P, Zupan Z, Ninković M, Branković M, Živanović M, Žeželj I. To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2023;:55-56.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928 .

Purić, Danka, Opačić, Goran, Petrović, Marija, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Teovanović, Predrag, Zupan, Zorana, Ninković, Milica, Branković, Marija, Živanović, Marko, Žeželj, Iris, "To prevent or to cure: How people use traditional, complementary and alternative medicine" in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2023):55-56,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4928 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/EIP2023_book_of_abstracts.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4925
AB  - Despite unknown efficiency, known risks, and associated adverse effects of certain traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) practices, the number of people using them appears to be on the rise. Existing taxonomies of TCAM practices mostly relied on either conceptual reasons, or they relied on attitudes toward TCAM, rather than its actual use. In this study, we sought to group TCAM practices based on their patterns of use. A sample of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants residing in Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 71 TCAM practices. For each practice, they indicated if and when they used it to promote their own or their children's health (options: never heard about it/never used it/more than a year ago/in the past year/during the past two weeks). To evaluate the lifetime use of TCAM, we binarized all TCAM items to reflect whether participants have ever used a given practice (never using a practice was coded as 0, using it at least once as 1). After excluding items with frequencies below 5%, we performed an exploratory factor analysis on the tetrachoric correlation matrix for the remaining 49 items. Using a minimum residual method of extraction and oblimin rotation, we identified four meaningful factors explaining 42% of total variance: 1) Natural product-based practices (NP) comprising the use of products such as extracts and supplements of herbal and non-herbal origin; 2) Rituals/Customs (RC) which reflected the use of traditional medicine and religious practices, such as visiting monasteries; 3) New age medicine (NA) incorporating mind-body therapies and energy medicine practices; and 4) Alternative medical systems (AMS) such as acupuncture, homeopathy, quantum medicine, and osteopathy/chiropractic. Factor correlations ranged from r = .18, p <.001 for RC and AMS to r = .30, p < .001 for NA and AMS. The latent structure we obtained based on the pattern of TCAM use corresponds closely to existing conceptual typologies, as well as to those based on attitudes toward TCAM. This suggests that consumers are sensitive to common characteristics of certain TCAM treatments and are more likely to resort to similar types of TCAM practices to promote their health. The existence of relatively independent factors of TCAM use opens the possibility of differential patterns of their psychological predictors and health-related outcomes.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use
EP  - 55
SP  - 54
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Purić, Danka and Petrović, Marija and Teovanović, Predrag and Živanović, Marko and Ninković, Milica and Zupan, Zorana and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Stanković, Sanda and Lukić, Petar and Branković, Marija and Opačić, Goran and Lazić, Aleksandra and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Despite unknown efficiency, known risks, and associated adverse effects of certain traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) practices, the number of people using them appears to be on the rise. Existing taxonomies of TCAM practices mostly relied on either conceptual reasons, or they relied on attitudes toward TCAM, rather than its actual use. In this study, we sought to group TCAM practices based on their patterns of use. A sample of N = 583 (Mage = 39.01 years, SDage = 12.10; 74.4% females) participants residing in Serbia completed an online survey including a list of 71 TCAM practices. For each practice, they indicated if and when they used it to promote their own or their children's health (options: never heard about it/never used it/more than a year ago/in the past year/during the past two weeks). To evaluate the lifetime use of TCAM, we binarized all TCAM items to reflect whether participants have ever used a given practice (never using a practice was coded as 0, using it at least once as 1). After excluding items with frequencies below 5%, we performed an exploratory factor analysis on the tetrachoric correlation matrix for the remaining 49 items. Using a minimum residual method of extraction and oblimin rotation, we identified four meaningful factors explaining 42% of total variance: 1) Natural product-based practices (NP) comprising the use of products such as extracts and supplements of herbal and non-herbal origin; 2) Rituals/Customs (RC) which reflected the use of traditional medicine and religious practices, such as visiting monasteries; 3) New age medicine (NA) incorporating mind-body therapies and energy medicine practices; and 4) Alternative medical systems (AMS) such as acupuncture, homeopathy, quantum medicine, and osteopathy/chiropractic. Factor correlations ranged from r = .18, p <.001 for RC and AMS to r = .30, p < .001 for NA and AMS. The latent structure we obtained based on the pattern of TCAM use corresponds closely to existing conceptual typologies, as well as to those based on attitudes toward TCAM. This suggests that consumers are sensitive to common characteristics of certain TCAM treatments and are more likely to resort to similar types of TCAM practices to promote their health. The existence of relatively independent factors of TCAM use opens the possibility of differential patterns of their psychological predictors and health-related outcomes.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use",
pages = "55-54",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925"
}

Purić, D., Petrović, M., Teovanović, P., Živanović, M., Ninković, M., Zupan, Z., Lazarević, L. B., Stanković, S., Lukić, P., Branković, M., Opačić, G., Lazić, A.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 54-55.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925

Purić D, Petrović M, Teovanović P, Živanović M, Ninković M, Zupan Z, Lazarević LB, Stanković S, Lukić P, Branković M, Opačić G, Lazić A, Žeželj I. The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use. in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2023;:54-55.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925 .

Purić, Danka, Petrović, Marija, Teovanović, Predrag, Živanović, Marko, Ninković, Milica, Zupan, Zorana, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Stanković, Sanda, Lukić, Petar, Branković, Marija, Opačić, Goran, Lazić, Aleksandra, Žeželj, Iris, "The latent structure of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine practices based on patterns of use" in Book of abstracts - XXIX scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2023):54-55,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4925 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4877
AB  - To describe how Serbian online media cover the topic of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TM/CAM), we conducted a content analysis of 182 articles from six news and six magazine websites, published July–December 2021. Biologically based treatments, predominantly herbal products framed as Serbian or Russian folk medicine, were the most common (70.9%, 205/289 practices). The practices were often presented as general health enhancers (18.4%, 71/386 claims); other common reasons given for the use of TM/CAM were to alleviate respiratory problems, boost the immunity, and detox. The tone was overwhelmingly positive, with most of the positive articles (82.4%, 145/176) neglecting to present information on potential harms of TM/CAM use. Few articles provided a recommendation to speak with a healthcare provider (13.6%, 24/176); in contrast, the recommended dosage was often explained (59.7%, 105/176). TM/CAM practitioners (15.9%, 28/176) and conventional medicine practitioners (12.5%, 22/176) were most commonly cited sources. Articles tended to appeal to TM/CAM’s tradition of use (65.3%, 115/176), naturalness (45.5%, 80/176), and convenience (40.9%, 72/176), used pseudoscientific jargon (59.7%, 105/176), and failed to cite sources for the claims that TM/CAM use is supported by science (22.2%, 39/176). Much of the information provided in Serbian online media seems to be uncritical, with a potential for misleading consumers.
T2  - Collabra: Psychology
T1  - Quick natural cure-alls: Portrayal of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in Serbian online media
IS  - 1
SP  - 82189
VL  - 9
DO  - 10.1525/collabra.82189
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Petrović, Marija and Branković, Marija and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "To describe how Serbian online media cover the topic of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TM/CAM), we conducted a content analysis of 182 articles from six news and six magazine websites, published July–December 2021. Biologically based treatments, predominantly herbal products framed as Serbian or Russian folk medicine, were the most common (70.9%, 205/289 practices). The practices were often presented as general health enhancers (18.4%, 71/386 claims); other common reasons given for the use of TM/CAM were to alleviate respiratory problems, boost the immunity, and detox. The tone was overwhelmingly positive, with most of the positive articles (82.4%, 145/176) neglecting to present information on potential harms of TM/CAM use. Few articles provided a recommendation to speak with a healthcare provider (13.6%, 24/176); in contrast, the recommended dosage was often explained (59.7%, 105/176). TM/CAM practitioners (15.9%, 28/176) and conventional medicine practitioners (12.5%, 22/176) were most commonly cited sources. Articles tended to appeal to TM/CAM’s tradition of use (65.3%, 115/176), naturalness (45.5%, 80/176), and convenience (40.9%, 72/176), used pseudoscientific jargon (59.7%, 105/176), and failed to cite sources for the claims that TM/CAM use is supported by science (22.2%, 39/176). Much of the information provided in Serbian online media seems to be uncritical, with a potential for misleading consumers.",
journal = "Collabra: Psychology",
title = "Quick natural cure-alls: Portrayal of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in Serbian online media",
number = "1",
pages = "82189",
volume = "9",
doi = "10.1525/collabra.82189"
}

Lazić, A., Petrović, M., Branković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Quick natural cure-alls: Portrayal of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in Serbian online media. in Collabra: Psychology, 9(1), 82189.
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.82189

Lazić A, Petrović M, Branković M, Žeželj I. Quick natural cure-alls: Portrayal of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in Serbian online media. in Collabra: Psychology. 2023;9(1):82189.
doi:10.1525/collabra.82189 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Petrović, Marija, Branković, Marija, Žeželj, Iris, "Quick natural cure-alls: Portrayal of traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in Serbian online media" in Collabra: Psychology, 9, no. 1 (2023):82189,
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.82189 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://2023.ehps.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/EHPS_2023_Abstracts_UPLOAD.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4878
AB  - Background: When the media does not adhere to reporting guidelines regarding traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TM/CAM), this may deceive or mislead consumers about the safety and efficacy of these practices. We analyzed whether Serbian online media adheres to reporting guidelines and described dominant psychological appeals used to promote TM/CAM. Methods: We conducted a content analysis of 182 articles from six news and six magazine websites, published July–December 2021. Findings: Biologically based treatments – predominantly herbal products – were the most common (205/289 practices). TM/CAM practices were claimed to improve general health (71/386 claims), as well as to alleviate respiratory problems, boost the immunity, and detox the body. The tone was overwhelmingly positive, with most of the positive articles (145/176) neglecting to disclose the potential harms of TM/CAM. Few articles provided a recommendation to speak with a healthcare provider (24/176). Articles tended to appeal to TM/CAM’s long tradition of use (115/176), naturalness (80/176), and convenience (72/176). They used vague pseudoscientific jargon (105/176) and failed to cite sources for the claims that TM/CAM use is supported by science (39/176). Discussion: Given that TM/CAM use may lead to harmful outcomes (such as adverse events, avoidance of official treatment or interaction with it), Serbian online media reports on TM/CAM are inadequate to assist consumers’ decision-making. Our findings highlight issues that need to be addressed towards ensuring more critical health reporting, and, ultimately, better informed TM/CAM consumption choices.
C3  - 37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September
T1  - ‘What is old and natural is harmless’: Traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in online media
DO  - 10.17605/OSF.IO/8Y4TK
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Petrović, Marija and Branković, Marija and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Background: When the media does not adhere to reporting guidelines regarding traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TM/CAM), this may deceive or mislead consumers about the safety and efficacy of these practices. We analyzed whether Serbian online media adheres to reporting guidelines and described dominant psychological appeals used to promote TM/CAM. Methods: We conducted a content analysis of 182 articles from six news and six magazine websites, published July–December 2021. Findings: Biologically based treatments – predominantly herbal products – were the most common (205/289 practices). TM/CAM practices were claimed to improve general health (71/386 claims), as well as to alleviate respiratory problems, boost the immunity, and detox the body. The tone was overwhelmingly positive, with most of the positive articles (145/176) neglecting to disclose the potential harms of TM/CAM. Few articles provided a recommendation to speak with a healthcare provider (24/176). Articles tended to appeal to TM/CAM’s long tradition of use (115/176), naturalness (80/176), and convenience (72/176). They used vague pseudoscientific jargon (105/176) and failed to cite sources for the claims that TM/CAM use is supported by science (39/176). Discussion: Given that TM/CAM use may lead to harmful outcomes (such as adverse events, avoidance of official treatment or interaction with it), Serbian online media reports on TM/CAM are inadequate to assist consumers’ decision-making. Our findings highlight issues that need to be addressed towards ensuring more critical health reporting, and, ultimately, better informed TM/CAM consumption choices.",
journal = "37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September",
title = "‘What is old and natural is harmless’: Traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in online media",
doi = "10.17605/OSF.IO/8Y4TK"
}

Lazić, A., Petrović, M., Branković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). ‘What is old and natural is harmless’: Traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in online media. in 37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September.
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8Y4TK

Lazić A, Petrović M, Branković M, Žeželj I. ‘What is old and natural is harmless’: Traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in online media. in 37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September. 2023;.
doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/8Y4TK .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Petrović, Marija, Branković, Marija, Žeželj, Iris, "‘What is old and natural is harmless’: Traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine in online media" in 37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September (2023),
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8Y4TK . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - https://2023.ehps.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/EHPS_2023_Abstracts_UPLOAD.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4879
AB  - Background: We explored the reasons young people in Serbia give for getting or not getting vaccinated and whether these reasons correspond to the selfish-rational and social norms models of vaccination choices. Methods: 229 participants aged 18–35 (71% women) completed an online survey. In a fictitious disease scenario, n=89 ‘vaccinators’ reported they would definitely/probably get vaccinated, while n=140 ‘nonvaccinators’ would definitely/probably not. They rated a list of reasons for (non-)vaccination (‘completely/somewhat describes my reasons’ indicated endorsement); an open-ended question elicited reasons outside of the two models. Findings: While vaccinators reported not relying on others for protection (46%), non-vaccinators rarely endorsed free-riding (‘many people got vaccinated so I don’t have to’; 19%). What the majority was doing (descriptive norm) was relevant for vaccinators (47%) and they trusted the ‘wisdom of the common man’ (43%); others' behavior was less important for non-vaccinators (25% and 33%, respectively). Weighing personal benefits against risks of vaccination was a common reason for both vaccinators (85%) and non-vaccinators (73%). Vaccinators viewed vaccination as necessary to protect oneself (99%) and others (90%) and as a collective effort to stop the disease (91%). Non-vaccinators believed they did not need vaccination to protect their health (62%). A part of the survey about COVID-19 (n=213) replicated this pattern of results. Discussion: While the reasons stemming from the two theoretical models were less endorsed by non-vaccinators (perhaps due to distrust in vaccine effectiveness), the analysis of open ended responses revealed new reasons (e.g. conspiratorial beliefs). Overall, this study can inform more targeted communication interventions.
C3  - 37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September
T1  - Why did you do it? Reasons for vaccination and non-vaccination among young adults in Serbia
DO  - 10.17605/OSF.IO/3RD6Z
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Background: We explored the reasons young people in Serbia give for getting or not getting vaccinated and whether these reasons correspond to the selfish-rational and social norms models of vaccination choices. Methods: 229 participants aged 18–35 (71% women) completed an online survey. In a fictitious disease scenario, n=89 ‘vaccinators’ reported they would definitely/probably get vaccinated, while n=140 ‘nonvaccinators’ would definitely/probably not. They rated a list of reasons for (non-)vaccination (‘completely/somewhat describes my reasons’ indicated endorsement); an open-ended question elicited reasons outside of the two models. Findings: While vaccinators reported not relying on others for protection (46%), non-vaccinators rarely endorsed free-riding (‘many people got vaccinated so I don’t have to’; 19%). What the majority was doing (descriptive norm) was relevant for vaccinators (47%) and they trusted the ‘wisdom of the common man’ (43%); others' behavior was less important for non-vaccinators (25% and 33%, respectively). Weighing personal benefits against risks of vaccination was a common reason for both vaccinators (85%) and non-vaccinators (73%). Vaccinators viewed vaccination as necessary to protect oneself (99%) and others (90%) and as a collective effort to stop the disease (91%). Non-vaccinators believed they did not need vaccination to protect their health (62%). A part of the survey about COVID-19 (n=213) replicated this pattern of results. Discussion: While the reasons stemming from the two theoretical models were less endorsed by non-vaccinators (perhaps due to distrust in vaccine effectiveness), the analysis of open ended responses revealed new reasons (e.g. conspiratorial beliefs). Overall, this study can inform more targeted communication interventions.",
journal = "37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September",
title = "Why did you do it? Reasons for vaccination and non-vaccination among young adults in Serbia",
doi = "10.17605/OSF.IO/3RD6Z"
}

Lazić, A.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). Why did you do it? Reasons for vaccination and non-vaccination among young adults in Serbia. in 37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September.
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3RD6Z

Lazić A, Žeželj I. Why did you do it? Reasons for vaccination and non-vaccination among young adults in Serbia. in 37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September. 2023;.
doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/3RD6Z .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Žeželj, Iris, "Why did you do it? Reasons for vaccination and non-vaccination among young adults in Serbia" in 37th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, 4-8 September (2023),
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3RD6Z . .

TY  - UNPB
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4904
AB  - Žеlеlе smo da ispitamo kako onlajn mеdiji u Srbiji izvеštavaju o narodnoj, komplеmеntarnoj i altеrnativnoj mеdicini. Cilj ovog istraživanja jе bio da ispita: 1) kojе praksе nеkonvеncionalnе mеdicinе mеdiji pominju i za šta tvrdе da su onе dobrе; 2) da li mеdiji pratе smеrnicе za odgovorno izvеštavanjе o zdravlju (na primеr, da li saopštavaju mogućе opasnosti, prеporučuju savеtovanja sa lеkarom ili navodе izvorе za tvrdnjе); 3) kako mеdiji promovišu upotrеbu nеkonvеncionalnе mеdicinе (tj. rеtoričkе stratеgijе, psеudonaučni žargon i drugi načini еksploatisanja naukе).
T1  - (Ne)odgovornost i retorika izveštavanja o narodnoj, komplementarnoj i alternativnoj medicini u srpskim onlajn medijima
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4904
ER  - 

@techreport{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Petrović, Marija and Branković, Marija and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Žеlеlе smo da ispitamo kako onlajn mеdiji u Srbiji izvеštavaju o narodnoj, komplеmеntarnoj i altеrnativnoj mеdicini. Cilj ovog istraživanja jе bio da ispita: 1) kojе praksе nеkonvеncionalnе mеdicinе mеdiji pominju i za šta tvrdе da su onе dobrе; 2) da li mеdiji pratе smеrnicе za odgovorno izvеštavanjе o zdravlju (na primеr, da li saopštavaju mogućе opasnosti, prеporučuju savеtovanja sa lеkarom ili navodе izvorе za tvrdnjе); 3) kako mеdiji promovišu upotrеbu nеkonvеncionalnе mеdicinе (tj. rеtoričkе stratеgijе, psеudonaučni žargon i drugi načini еksploatisanja naukе).",
title = "(Ne)odgovornost i retorika izveštavanja o narodnoj, komplementarnoj i alternativnoj medicini u srpskim onlajn medijima",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4904"
}

Lazić, A., Petrović, M., Branković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2023). (Ne)odgovornost i retorika izveštavanja o narodnoj, komplementarnoj i alternativnoj medicini u srpskim onlajn medijima. .
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4904

Lazić A, Petrović M, Branković M, Žeželj I. (Ne)odgovornost i retorika izveštavanja o narodnoj, komplementarnoj i alternativnoj medicini u srpskim onlajn medijima. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4904 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Petrović, Marija, Branković, Marija, Žeželj, Iris, "(Ne)odgovornost i retorika izveštavanja o narodnoj, komplementarnoj i alternativnoj medicini u srpskim onlajn medijima" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4904 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Facciani, Matthew
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Viggiano, Gracemarie
AU  - McKay, Tara
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4552
AB  - Political polarization is growing rapidly in the United States and has been linked to politicized public health issues including vaccination. Political homogeneity among one's interpersonal relationships may predict polarization levels and partisan bias. In this study, we analyzed if political network structure predicted partisan beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine, beliefs about vaccines in general, and COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Personal networks were measured by whom the respondent discussed “important matters” with to obtain a list of individuals who are close to the respondent. The number of associates listed who share the political identity or vaccine status with the respondent was calculated as a measure of homogeneity. We find that having more Republicans and unvaccinated individuals in one's network predicted lower vaccine confidence whereas having more Democrats and vaccinated individuals in one's network predicted higher vaccine confidence. Exploratory network analyses revealed that non-kin others are especially impactful on vaccine attitudes when those network connections are also Republican and unvaccinated.
T2  - Social Science & Medicine
T1  - Political network composition predicts vaccination attitudes
SP  - 116004
VL  - 328
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116004
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Facciani, Matthew and Lazić, Aleksandra and Viggiano, Gracemarie and McKay, Tara",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Political polarization is growing rapidly in the United States and has been linked to politicized public health issues including vaccination. Political homogeneity among one's interpersonal relationships may predict polarization levels and partisan bias. In this study, we analyzed if political network structure predicted partisan beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine, beliefs about vaccines in general, and COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Personal networks were measured by whom the respondent discussed “important matters” with to obtain a list of individuals who are close to the respondent. The number of associates listed who share the political identity or vaccine status with the respondent was calculated as a measure of homogeneity. We find that having more Republicans and unvaccinated individuals in one's network predicted lower vaccine confidence whereas having more Democrats and vaccinated individuals in one's network predicted higher vaccine confidence. Exploratory network analyses revealed that non-kin others are especially impactful on vaccine attitudes when those network connections are also Republican and unvaccinated.",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
title = "Political network composition predicts vaccination attitudes",
pages = "116004",
volume = "328",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116004"
}

Facciani, M., Lazić, A., Viggiano, G.,& McKay, T.. (2023). Political network composition predicts vaccination attitudes. in Social Science & Medicine, 328, 116004.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116004

Facciani M, Lazić A, Viggiano G, McKay T. Political network composition predicts vaccination attitudes. in Social Science & Medicine. 2023;328:116004.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116004 .

Facciani, Matthew, Lazić, Aleksandra, Viggiano, Gracemarie, McKay, Tara, "Political network composition predicts vaccination attitudes" in Social Science & Medicine, 328 (2023):116004,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116004 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vraga, Emily K.
AU  - Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Azlan, Arina A.
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4551
AB  - Although misinformation is not a new problem, questions about its prevalence, its public impact, and how to combat it have taken on new urgency. An obvious solution to the problem of misinformation is to offer corrections (or debunkings) designed to clarify what is true and what is false. But corrections are not a panacea. Given the scope of the misinformation problem, we must consider: (1) which misinformation to prioritise for correction; (2) how to best correct misinformation; and (3) what else can be done pre-emptively to protect the public from future misdirection, as well as the need to tailor solutions to recognise cultural contexts. In deciding whether to correct, the source of the misinformation, its likely audience, and its harm should all be considered. Correction impact can be maximised by using REACT: repetition, empathy, alternative explanations, credible sources, and timeliness. Beyond correction, we must consider proactive solutions to build audience awareness and resistance. Promoting ‘sticky’ high-quality information, warning people against common myths and misleading techniques, encouraging health and information literacy, and designing platforms more resilient to misinformation efforts are all essential components in the management of infodemics now, and going forward into the future.
PB  - Springer, Cham
T2  - Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century
T1  - To Debunk or Not to Debunk? Correcting (Mis)Information
EP  - 98
SP  - 85
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_7
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Vraga, Emily K. and Ecker, Ullrich K. H. and Žeželj, Iris and Lazić, Aleksandra and Azlan, Arina A.",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Although misinformation is not a new problem, questions about its prevalence, its public impact, and how to combat it have taken on new urgency. An obvious solution to the problem of misinformation is to offer corrections (or debunkings) designed to clarify what is true and what is false. But corrections are not a panacea. Given the scope of the misinformation problem, we must consider: (1) which misinformation to prioritise for correction; (2) how to best correct misinformation; and (3) what else can be done pre-emptively to protect the public from future misdirection, as well as the need to tailor solutions to recognise cultural contexts. In deciding whether to correct, the source of the misinformation, its likely audience, and its harm should all be considered. Correction impact can be maximised by using REACT: repetition, empathy, alternative explanations, credible sources, and timeliness. Beyond correction, we must consider proactive solutions to build audience awareness and resistance. Promoting ‘sticky’ high-quality information, warning people against common myths and misleading techniques, encouraging health and information literacy, and designing platforms more resilient to misinformation efforts are all essential components in the management of infodemics now, and going forward into the future.",
publisher = "Springer, Cham",
journal = "Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century",
booktitle = "To Debunk or Not to Debunk? Correcting (Mis)Information",
pages = "98-85",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_7"
}

Vraga, E. K., Ecker, U. K. H., Žeželj, I., Lazić, A.,& Azlan, A. A.. (2023). To Debunk or Not to Debunk? Correcting (Mis)Information. in Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century
Springer, Cham., 85-98.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_7

Vraga EK, Ecker UKH, Žeželj I, Lazić A, Azlan AA. To Debunk or Not to Debunk? Correcting (Mis)Information. in Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century. 2023;:85-98.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_7 .

Vraga, Emily K., Ecker, Ullrich K. H., Žeželj, Iris, Lazić, Aleksandra, Azlan, Arina A., "To Debunk or Not to Debunk? Correcting (Mis)Information" in Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century (2023):85-98,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_7 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Petrović, Marija
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2022_FIN-sa-isbn_bez_linija-1.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4930
AB  - The main project methodology is planned in five stages that inform one another and cross-validate data from multiple methods. These include: (1) A study documenting online media coverage of TM/CAM practices in Serbia. This study will use a qualitative methodology, and conduct a content analysis of news stories from the five most popular news websites in Serbia, focusing on identifying the types of reported practices and content of the advice (e.g., whether risks are addressed) (2) Development of instruments for assessing familiarity and frequency of two types of health behaviors: engagement with different TM/CAM practices, as well as the frequency of NAR. Instrument development will be based on the results of the qualitative study, literature review, input from medical and CAM practitioners. The instrument will be piloted on a convenience sample (3) A study tracking the prevalence and the pattern of TM/CAM usage and NAR during 3 weeks on a community sample. This study will consist of a development of a mobile app and battery for experience sampling of TM/CAM and NAR behaviors over 21 days and their relations with personality and cognitive styles in a community sample (4) Examining the relations between these two types of health behaviors on a general population. This study will explore the relations between TM/CAM, NAR, personality, and cognitive styles on a representative sample in Serbia. (5) Developing interventions aimed at reducing TM/CAM use and NAR through changing the irrational mindset. This study will be experimental and will examine how inducing or reducing irrational beliefs affects health behaviors, and if certain personality traits and/or thinking styles moderate the outcome of these interventions.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - REASON4HEALTH: Methodology
SP  - 27
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Zupan, Zorana and Žeželj, Iris and Knežević, Goran and Opačić, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Branković, Marija and Teovanović, Predrag and Živanović, Marko and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Ninković, Milica and Petrović, Marija",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The main project methodology is planned in five stages that inform one another and cross-validate data from multiple methods. These include: (1) A study documenting online media coverage of TM/CAM practices in Serbia. This study will use a qualitative methodology, and conduct a content analysis of news stories from the five most popular news websites in Serbia, focusing on identifying the types of reported practices and content of the advice (e.g., whether risks are addressed) (2) Development of instruments for assessing familiarity and frequency of two types of health behaviors: engagement with different TM/CAM practices, as well as the frequency of NAR. Instrument development will be based on the results of the qualitative study, literature review, input from medical and CAM practitioners. The instrument will be piloted on a convenience sample (3) A study tracking the prevalence and the pattern of TM/CAM usage and NAR during 3 weeks on a community sample. This study will consist of a development of a mobile app and battery for experience sampling of TM/CAM and NAR behaviors over 21 days and their relations with personality and cognitive styles in a community sample (4) Examining the relations between these two types of health behaviors on a general population. This study will explore the relations between TM/CAM, NAR, personality, and cognitive styles on a representative sample in Serbia. (5) Developing interventions aimed at reducing TM/CAM use and NAR through changing the irrational mindset. This study will be experimental and will examine how inducing or reducing irrational beliefs affects health behaviors, and if certain personality traits and/or thinking styles moderate the outcome of these interventions.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "REASON4HEALTH: Methodology",
pages = "27",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930"
}

Zupan, Z., Žeželj, I., Knežević, G., Opačić, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Branković, M., Teovanović, P., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Ninković, M.,& Petrović, M.. (2022). REASON4HEALTH: Methodology. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 27.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930

Zupan Z, Žeželj I, Knežević G, Opačić G, Lazarević LB, Purić D, Branković M, Teovanović P, Živanović M, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Ninković M, Petrović M. REASON4HEALTH: Methodology. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2022;:27.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930 .

Zupan, Zorana, Žeželj, Iris, Knežević, Goran, Opačić, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Branković, Marija, Teovanović, Predrag, Živanović, Marko, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Ninković, Milica, Petrović, Marija, "REASON4HEALTH: Methodology" in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2022):27,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4930 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
AU  - Knežević, Goran
AU  - Opačić, Goran
AU  - Lazarević, Ljiljana B.
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Branković, Marija
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Živanović, Marko
AU  - Stanković, Sanda
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Petrović, Marija
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2022_FIN-sa-isbn_bez_linija-1.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4929
AB  - Non-adherence to medical recommendations (NAR) leads to increasing mortality/disease rates and raises the costs of treatments, thus it is a burden on the healthcare system. Typically viewed as harmless, the use of traditional/complementary/alternative medicine (TM/CAM) can lead to adverse health events, but also to avoidance of official treatment or undesirable interaction with it. Thus, there is an increasing call in the medical community to promote evidence-based use of TM/CAM and adherence to official advice; understanding why consumers opt for questionable health practices can contribute to this call. We put forward a comprehensive program to study the psychological roots of these two broad categories of questionable health practices. The program offers a framework for concepts from cognitive, personality, social, and health psychology. We propose that an irrational mindset (a system of irrational thinking and beliefs), rooted in basic psychological dispositions (personality, thinking styles) makes certain consumers susceptible to NAR and TM/CAM practices. We plan to: a. explore the media environment the consumers are exposed to (e.g. predatory practices in advertising TM/CAM), b. identify the large spectrum of NAR and TM/CAM typical for the local cultural context, c. test whether irrational beliefs of very different content really form a mindset (how they are interrelated), d. measure the prevalence of NAR and TM/CAM and relate them to irrational mindset and further to personality traits, and e. test whether the TM/CAM proneness can be affected by manipulating irrational beliefs. The results will be useful to stakeholders in different ways: information on the prevalence of TM/CAM and NAR in Serbia is useful by itself, but identifying their underlying psychological mechanisms will help in understanding the most vulnerable portions of the population. In addition, we will provide useful input for designing interventions that will support consumers in making rational health decisions.
C3  - Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology
T1  - REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact
SP  - 26
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Žeželj, Iris and Knežević, Goran and Opačić, Goran and Lazarević, Ljiljana B. and Purić, Danka and Branković, Marija and Zupan, Zorana and Teovanović, Predrag and Živanović, Marko and Stanković, Sanda and Lazić, Aleksandra and Lukić, Petar and Ninković, Milica and Petrović, Marija",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Non-adherence to medical recommendations (NAR) leads to increasing mortality/disease rates and raises the costs of treatments, thus it is a burden on the healthcare system. Typically viewed as harmless, the use of traditional/complementary/alternative medicine (TM/CAM) can lead to adverse health events, but also to avoidance of official treatment or undesirable interaction with it. Thus, there is an increasing call in the medical community to promote evidence-based use of TM/CAM and adherence to official advice; understanding why consumers opt for questionable health practices can contribute to this call. We put forward a comprehensive program to study the psychological roots of these two broad categories of questionable health practices. The program offers a framework for concepts from cognitive, personality, social, and health psychology. We propose that an irrational mindset (a system of irrational thinking and beliefs), rooted in basic psychological dispositions (personality, thinking styles) makes certain consumers susceptible to NAR and TM/CAM practices. We plan to: a. explore the media environment the consumers are exposed to (e.g. predatory practices in advertising TM/CAM), b. identify the large spectrum of NAR and TM/CAM typical for the local cultural context, c. test whether irrational beliefs of very different content really form a mindset (how they are interrelated), d. measure the prevalence of NAR and TM/CAM and relate them to irrational mindset and further to personality traits, and e. test whether the TM/CAM proneness can be affected by manipulating irrational beliefs. The results will be useful to stakeholders in different ways: information on the prevalence of TM/CAM and NAR in Serbia is useful by itself, but identifying their underlying psychological mechanisms will help in understanding the most vulnerable portions of the population. In addition, we will provide useful input for designing interventions that will support consumers in making rational health decisions.",
journal = "Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology",
title = "REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact",
pages = "26",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929"
}

Žeželj, I., Knežević, G., Opačić, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Branković, M., Zupan, Z., Teovanović, P., Živanović, M., Stanković, S., Lazić, A., Lukić, P., Ninković, M.,& Petrović, M.. (2022). REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, 26.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929

Žeželj I, Knežević G, Opačić G, Lazarević LB, Purić D, Branković M, Zupan Z, Teovanović P, Živanović M, Stanković S, Lazić A, Lukić P, Ninković M, Petrović M. REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact. in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology. 2022;:26.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929 .

Žeželj, Iris, Knežević, Goran, Opačić, Goran, Lazarević, Ljiljana B., Purić, Danka, Branković, Marija, Zupan, Zorana, Teovanović, Predrag, Živanović, Marko, Stanković, Sanda, Lazić, Aleksandra, Lukić, Petar, Ninković, Milica, Petrović, Marija, "REASON4HEALTH: Rationale and impact" in Book of abstracts - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology (2022):26,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4929 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Dojčinović, Sara
AU  - Draginić, Katarina
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2022_FIN-sa-isbn_bez_linija-1.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4333
AB  - The 7C scale of vaccination readiness (Geiger et al., 2021) is a newly introduced instrument that distinguishes between seven components determining the likelihood that an individual will be willing to get vaccinated: Confidence (trust in vaccines and health authorities), Complacency (low perceived disease risk), Constraints (structural and psychological barriers), Calculation (weighting personal costs and benefits), Collective Responsibility (desire to protect others), Compliance (support for societal monitoring and punishment of the unvaccinated), and Conspiracy (belief in misinformation). We wanted to test the reliability of the forward-backward translated 7C scale in Serbia and how it relates to existing measures (construct validity) and reported vaccination behaviors (concurrent validity). Data were collected in an online survey distributed on social media in December 2021. We administered the 7C scale with three items per component (rating scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree). In the sample of N = 404 participants residing in Serbia (aged 18–77 years, M = 48.4, SD = 12.9), 56.44% reported being female; 2.48% had elementary or no education, 44.06% a high school education, and 53.46% higher education. Internal consistency was high for the full scale (Cronbach’s alpha = .95) and satisfactory for all components (.79–.94), except Calculation (.63). Confidence was related to trust in health care providers (r = .53), health care institutions (r = .50), and science (r = .56, all ps < .001). Complacency was related to subjective danger invulnerability (r = -.35, p < .001). Compliance was related to support for COVID-19 vaccine certificates (r = .91) and mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for adults (r = .89, all ps < .001) in Serbia. Conspiracy was related to conspiracy mentality (r = .66) and general vaccine (r = .90) and COVID-19 pandemic conspiracy beliefs (r = .79, all ps < .001). The total score was related to past vaccine hesitancy (r = -.54) and future intention to get vaccinated (r = 0.86, all ps < .001). It predicted higher odds of having received at least one dose (OR = 6.61, 95% CI [4.65, 9.41], n = 383, 54.05% vaccinated) as well as the third dose (OR = 2.79, 95% CI [1.96, 3.98], n = 205, 71.22% vaccinated) of the COVID-19 vaccine. The 7C scale in Serbian and its components correlated with validation constructs in the expected directions and showed promise in predicting real-world vaccination outcomes.
PB  - Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet
C3  - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology
T1  - Preliminary  findings on the validation of the 7C scale of vaccination readiness in Serbia
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4333
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Dojčinović, Sara and Draginić, Katarina",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The 7C scale of vaccination readiness (Geiger et al., 2021) is a newly introduced instrument that distinguishes between seven components determining the likelihood that an individual will be willing to get vaccinated: Confidence (trust in vaccines and health authorities), Complacency (low perceived disease risk), Constraints (structural and psychological barriers), Calculation (weighting personal costs and benefits), Collective Responsibility (desire to protect others), Compliance (support for societal monitoring and punishment of the unvaccinated), and Conspiracy (belief in misinformation). We wanted to test the reliability of the forward-backward translated 7C scale in Serbia and how it relates to existing measures (construct validity) and reported vaccination behaviors (concurrent validity). Data were collected in an online survey distributed on social media in December 2021. We administered the 7C scale with three items per component (rating scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree). In the sample of N = 404 participants residing in Serbia (aged 18–77 years, M = 48.4, SD = 12.9), 56.44% reported being female; 2.48% had elementary or no education, 44.06% a high school education, and 53.46% higher education. Internal consistency was high for the full scale (Cronbach’s alpha = .95) and satisfactory for all components (.79–.94), except Calculation (.63). Confidence was related to trust in health care providers (r = .53), health care institutions (r = .50), and science (r = .56, all ps < .001). Complacency was related to subjective danger invulnerability (r = -.35, p < .001). Compliance was related to support for COVID-19 vaccine certificates (r = .91) and mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for adults (r = .89, all ps < .001) in Serbia. Conspiracy was related to conspiracy mentality (r = .66) and general vaccine (r = .90) and COVID-19 pandemic conspiracy beliefs (r = .79, all ps < .001). The total score was related to past vaccine hesitancy (r = -.54) and future intention to get vaccinated (r = 0.86, all ps < .001). It predicted higher odds of having received at least one dose (OR = 6.61, 95% CI [4.65, 9.41], n = 383, 54.05% vaccinated) as well as the third dose (OR = 2.79, 95% CI [1.96, 3.98], n = 205, 71.22% vaccinated) of the COVID-19 vaccine. The 7C scale in Serbian and its components correlated with validation constructs in the expected directions and showed promise in predicting real-world vaccination outcomes.",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology",
title = "Preliminary  findings on the validation of the 7C scale of vaccination readiness in Serbia",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4333"
}

Lazić, A., Dojčinović, S.,& Draginić, K.. (2022). Preliminary  findings on the validation of the 7C scale of vaccination readiness in Serbia. in XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology
Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4333

Lazić A, Dojčinović S, Draginić K. Preliminary  findings on the validation of the 7C scale of vaccination readiness in Serbia. in XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4333 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Dojčinović, Sara, Draginić, Katarina, "Preliminary  findings on the validation of the 7C scale of vaccination readiness in Serbia" in XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4333 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/KNJIGA-REZIMEA-2022_FIN-sa-isbn_bez_linija-1.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4332
AB  - A popular approach to health communication is the deficit model, which emphasizes the repetition of objective scientific evidence to motivate people to change their beliefs and behaviors. Increasingly, however, health communicators are turning to narratives or the stories people tell. Narratives can be persuasive by fostering engagement with the story and its characters and by provoking an emotional response. Focusing on the domain of vaccination, we conducted a preliminary systematic review to explore how narrative communication compares to factual communication and whether it can influence vaccination outcomes. We identified primary studies through previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We additionally searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published 2015–2019, with terms such as “story”, “anecdote” or “immunization” in the title. We included experimental designs contrasting a pro-vaccine narrative to (a) a control/baseline condition and/or (b) facts-only and statistics-only (including risk) messages. We also included designs testing combined narrative and factual/statistical messages. The review included 17 eligible articles published 2005–2019. The studies were predominantly conducted in the US and concerned the human papillomavirus vaccine (11 articles, respectively). All narrative interventions featured a personal-experience story. We extracted 97 comparisons (k) of intervention groups and contrast groups. The most studied outcomes were vaccination intentions (k = 37), perceived disease risk (k = 18), and general vaccination attitudes and beliefs (k = 15). Compared to control/baseline, narrative-only messages tended to positively affect vaccination outcomes (k = 19/32), rarely backfiring (k = 4/32). Half of the time, narrative-only outperformed facts-/statistics-only messages (k = 23/45), while facts-/statistics-only messages were better in 14/45 instances. Combined interventions were better than the control/baseline (k = 8/8), statistics-only (k = 6/9), and narrative-only messages (k = 2/3). We conclude that a promising strategy in vaccination communication is combining scientific facts with personal stories tailored to the audience's sociocultural characteristics. We give recommendations for public communicators and directions for future research (e.g. larger samples for more precise effect size estimates, tackling conspiracy beliefs, and assessing effectiveness of interventions after a delay).
PB  - Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet
C3  - XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology
T1  - Combining scientific facts with personal stories leads to more persuasive vaccination communication: A preliminary systematic review
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4332
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra",
year = "2022",
abstract = "A popular approach to health communication is the deficit model, which emphasizes the repetition of objective scientific evidence to motivate people to change their beliefs and behaviors. Increasingly, however, health communicators are turning to narratives or the stories people tell. Narratives can be persuasive by fostering engagement with the story and its characters and by provoking an emotional response. Focusing on the domain of vaccination, we conducted a preliminary systematic review to explore how narrative communication compares to factual communication and whether it can influence vaccination outcomes. We identified primary studies through previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We additionally searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published 2015–2019, with terms such as “story”, “anecdote” or “immunization” in the title. We included experimental designs contrasting a pro-vaccine narrative to (a) a control/baseline condition and/or (b) facts-only and statistics-only (including risk) messages. We also included designs testing combined narrative and factual/statistical messages. The review included 17 eligible articles published 2005–2019. The studies were predominantly conducted in the US and concerned the human papillomavirus vaccine (11 articles, respectively). All narrative interventions featured a personal-experience story. We extracted 97 comparisons (k) of intervention groups and contrast groups. The most studied outcomes were vaccination intentions (k = 37), perceived disease risk (k = 18), and general vaccination attitudes and beliefs (k = 15). Compared to control/baseline, narrative-only messages tended to positively affect vaccination outcomes (k = 19/32), rarely backfiring (k = 4/32). Half of the time, narrative-only outperformed facts-/statistics-only messages (k = 23/45), while facts-/statistics-only messages were better in 14/45 instances. Combined interventions were better than the control/baseline (k = 8/8), statistics-only (k = 6/9), and narrative-only messages (k = 2/3). We conclude that a promising strategy in vaccination communication is combining scientific facts with personal stories tailored to the audience's sociocultural characteristics. We give recommendations for public communicators and directions for future research (e.g. larger samples for more precise effect size estimates, tackling conspiracy beliefs, and assessing effectiveness of interventions after a delay).",
publisher = "Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet",
journal = "XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology",
title = "Combining scientific facts with personal stories leads to more persuasive vaccination communication: A preliminary systematic review",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4332"
}

Lazić, A.. (2022). Combining scientific facts with personal stories leads to more persuasive vaccination communication: A preliminary systematic review. in XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology
Institut za psihologiju i Laboratorija za eksperimentalnu psihologiju, Beograd: Filozofski fakultet..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4332

Lazić A. Combining scientific facts with personal stories leads to more persuasive vaccination communication: A preliminary systematic review. in XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4332 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, "Combining scientific facts with personal stories leads to more persuasive vaccination communication: A preliminary systematic review" in XXVIII scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4332 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4330
AB  - Objective: This content analysis study explored how online news media communicates and frames vaccination rates and herd immunity (the effect where enough people are immune, the virus is contained).
Methods: We analyzed 160 vaccination-related news stories by nine highest-trafficked news websites in Serbia, published July–December 2017, around the start of the measles outbreak. We coded both the news story as a whole and every vaccination-rate mention (N = 339).
Results: News stories framed current vaccination rates and changes in them in a predominantly negative way (175/241 and 67/98 mentions, respectively) (e.g., “only 50% vaccinated”, “fewer parents vaccinating their children”), especially when referring to the measles vaccine (202/262 mentions). A total of 23/86 of news stories mentioning vaccination rates did not provide any numerical values. Reference groups for vaccination rates were rarely specified. Out of the 32 news stories mentioning herd immunity, 11 explained the effect.
Conclusions: Even routine communication of vaccination rates can be biased through negative frames and imprecise descriptions. Lamenting low immunization rates could activate a negative descriptive social norm (“many people are not getting vaccinated”), which may be especially ill-advised in the absence of an explanation of the social benefit of achieving herd immunity through vaccination.
T2  - Psychology & Health
T1  - Negativity in online news coverage of vaccination rates in Serbia: a content analysis
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2121962
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Objective: This content analysis study explored how online news media communicates and frames vaccination rates and herd immunity (the effect where enough people are immune, the virus is contained).
Methods: We analyzed 160 vaccination-related news stories by nine highest-trafficked news websites in Serbia, published July–December 2017, around the start of the measles outbreak. We coded both the news story as a whole and every vaccination-rate mention (N = 339).
Results: News stories framed current vaccination rates and changes in them in a predominantly negative way (175/241 and 67/98 mentions, respectively) (e.g., “only 50% vaccinated”, “fewer parents vaccinating their children”), especially when referring to the measles vaccine (202/262 mentions). A total of 23/86 of news stories mentioning vaccination rates did not provide any numerical values. Reference groups for vaccination rates were rarely specified. Out of the 32 news stories mentioning herd immunity, 11 explained the effect.
Conclusions: Even routine communication of vaccination rates can be biased through negative frames and imprecise descriptions. Lamenting low immunization rates could activate a negative descriptive social norm (“many people are not getting vaccinated”), which may be especially ill-advised in the absence of an explanation of the social benefit of achieving herd immunity through vaccination.",
journal = "Psychology & Health",
title = "Negativity in online news coverage of vaccination rates in Serbia: a content analysis",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2121962"
}

Lazić, A.,& Žeželj, I.. (2022). Negativity in online news coverage of vaccination rates in Serbia: a content analysis. in Psychology & Health.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2121962

Lazić A, Žeželj I. Negativity in online news coverage of vaccination rates in Serbia: a content analysis. in Psychology & Health. 2022;.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2121962 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Žeželj, Iris, "Negativity in online news coverage of vaccination rates in Serbia: a content analysis" in Psychology & Health (2022),
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2022.2121962 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Baucal, Aleksandar
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4329
AB  - Two preregistered quasi-experiments disentangled the effects of selfish genes and selfish memes on participants’ self-reported willingness to help in hypothetical everyday-favor and life-or-death situations. Memes were operationalized as the perceived level of similarity in important attitudes and values between the person participating in the study and a selected target person, assessed and reported by the participant. In Study 1 (N = 761), altruism was highest for siblings, and then for cousins and nonkin; greater memetic similarity was also associated with greater altruism; and the interaction between the factors was not significant. In Study 2 (N = 841), conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, altruism was highest for siblings, but the same for cousins and nonkin; the effect of memetic similarity was replicated; and the interaction term remained insignificant. Both studies controlled for a range of demographic and social relationship characteristics, suggesting a potentially relevant role of future contact probability and emotional closeness. We propose that, similarly to gene selfishness, meme selfishness can also bring about altruism: individuals would rather make a personal sacrifice to help memetically similar than dissimilar others because similar others have a higher chance of spreading the helper’s memes.
T2  - Psihologija
T1  - Selfish genes or selfish memes: The effect of genetic relatedness versus value similarity on altruism
EP  - 395
IS  - 4
SP  - 379
VL  - 55
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211107009B
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Baucal, Aleksandar and Lazić, Aleksandra",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Two preregistered quasi-experiments disentangled the effects of selfish genes and selfish memes on participants’ self-reported willingness to help in hypothetical everyday-favor and life-or-death situations. Memes were operationalized as the perceived level of similarity in important attitudes and values between the person participating in the study and a selected target person, assessed and reported by the participant. In Study 1 (N = 761), altruism was highest for siblings, and then for cousins and nonkin; greater memetic similarity was also associated with greater altruism; and the interaction between the factors was not significant. In Study 2 (N = 841), conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, altruism was highest for siblings, but the same for cousins and nonkin; the effect of memetic similarity was replicated; and the interaction term remained insignificant. Both studies controlled for a range of demographic and social relationship characteristics, suggesting a potentially relevant role of future contact probability and emotional closeness. We propose that, similarly to gene selfishness, meme selfishness can also bring about altruism: individuals would rather make a personal sacrifice to help memetically similar than dissimilar others because similar others have a higher chance of spreading the helper’s memes.",
journal = "Psihologija",
title = "Selfish genes or selfish memes: The effect of genetic relatedness versus value similarity on altruism",
pages = "395-379",
number = "4",
volume = "55",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211107009B"
}

Baucal, A.,& Lazić, A.. (2022). Selfish genes or selfish memes: The effect of genetic relatedness versus value similarity on altruism. in Psihologija, 55(4), 379-395.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211107009B

Baucal A, Lazić A. Selfish genes or selfish memes: The effect of genetic relatedness versus value similarity on altruism. in Psihologija. 2022;55(4):379-395.
doi:https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211107009B .

Baucal, Aleksandar, Lazić, Aleksandra, "Selfish genes or selfish memes: The effect of genetic relatedness versus value similarity on altruism" in Psihologija, 55, no. 4 (2022):379-395,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI211107009B . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Parsons, Sam
AU  - Azevedo, Flávio
AU  - Elsherif, Mahmoud M.
AU  - Guay, Samuel
AU  - Shahim, Owen N.
AU  - Govaart, Gisela H.
AU  - Norris, Emma
AU  - O’Mahony, Aoife
AU  - Parker, Adam J.
AU  - Todorovic, Ana
AU  - Pennington, Charlotte R.
AU  - Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Robertson, Olly
AU  - Middleton, Sara L.
AU  - Valentini, Beatrice
AU  - McCuaig, Joanne
AU  - Baker, Bradley J.
AU  - Collins, Elizabeth
AU  - Fillon, Adrien A.
AU  - Lonsdorf, Tina B.
AU  - Lim, Michele C.
AU  - Vanek, Norbert
AU  - Kovacs, Marton
AU  - Roettger, Timo B.
AU  - Rishi, Sonia
AU  - Miranda, Jacob F.
AU  - Jaquiery, Matt
AU  - Stewart, Suzanne L. K.
AU  - Agostini, Valeria
AU  - Stewart, Andrew J.
AU  - Izydorczak, Kamil
AU  - Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah
AU  - Hartmann, Helena
AU  - Ingham, Madeleine
AU  - Yamada, Yuki
AU  - Vasilev, Martin R.
AU  - Dechterenko, Filip
AU  - Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan
AU  - Yang, Yu-Fang
AU  - LaPlume, Annalise A.
AU  - Wolska, Julia K.
AU  - Henderson, Emma L.
AU  - Zaneva, Mirela
AU  - Farrar, Benjamin G.
AU  - Mounce, Ross
AU  - Kalandadze, Tamara
AU  - Li, Wanyin
AU  - Xiao, Qinyu
AU  - Ross, Robert M.
AU  - Yeung, Siu Kit
AU  - Liu, Meng
AU  - Vandegrift, Micah L.
AU  - Kekecs, Zoltan
AU  - Topor, Marta K.
AU  - Baum, Myriam A.
AU  - Williams, Emily A.
AU  - Assaneea, Asma A.
AU  - Bret, Amélie
AU  - Cashin, Aidan G.
AU  - Ballou, Nick
AU  - Dumbalska, Tsvetomira
AU  - Kern, Bettina M. J.
AU  - Melia, Claire R.
AU  - Arendt, Beatrix
AU  - Vineyard, Gerald H.
AU  - Pickering, Jade S.
AU  - Evans, Thomas R.
AU  - Laverty, Catherine
AU  - Woodward, Eliza A.
AU  - Moreau, David
AU  - Roche, Dominique G.
AU  - Rinke, Eike M.
AU  - Reid, Graham
AU  - Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo
AU  - Verheyen, Steven
AU  - Kocalar, Halil E.
AU  - Blake, Ashley R.
AU  - Cockcroft, Jamie P.
AU  - Micheli, Leticia
AU  - Beffara Bret, Brice
AU  - Flack, Zoe M.
AU  - Szaszi, Barnabas
AU  - Weinmann, Markus
AU  - Lecuona, Oscar
AU  - Schmidt, Birgit
AU  - Ngiam, William X.
AU  - Mendes, Ana Barbosa
AU  - Francis, Shannon
AU  - Gall, Brett J.
AU  - Paul, Mariella
AU  - Keating, Connor T.
AU  - Grose-Hodge, Magdalena
AU  - Bartlett, James E.
AU  - Iley, Bethan J.
AU  - Spitzer, Lisa
AU  - Pownall, Madeleine
AU  - Graham, Christopher J.
AU  - Wingen, Tobias
AU  - Terry, Jenny
AU  - Oliveira, Catia Margarida F.
AU  - Millager, Ryan A.
AU  - Fox, Kerry J.
AU  - AlDoh, Alaa
AU  - Hart, Alexander
AU  - van den Akker, Olmo R.
AU  - Feldman, Gilad
AU  - Kiersz, Dominik A.
AU  - Pomareda, Christina
AU  - Krautter, Kai
AU  - Al-Hoorie, Ali H.
AU  - Aczel, Balazs
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4328
AB  - Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers.
T2  - Nature Human Behaviour
T1  - A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms
EP  - 318
IS  - 3
SP  - 312
VL  - 6
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Parsons, Sam and Azevedo, Flávio and Elsherif, Mahmoud M. and Guay, Samuel and Shahim, Owen N. and Govaart, Gisela H. and Norris, Emma and O’Mahony, Aoife and Parker, Adam J. and Todorovic, Ana and Pennington, Charlotte R. and Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias and Lazić, Aleksandra and Robertson, Olly and Middleton, Sara L. and Valentini, Beatrice and McCuaig, Joanne and Baker, Bradley J. and Collins, Elizabeth and Fillon, Adrien A. and Lonsdorf, Tina B. and Lim, Michele C. and Vanek, Norbert and Kovacs, Marton and Roettger, Timo B. and Rishi, Sonia and Miranda, Jacob F. and Jaquiery, Matt and Stewart, Suzanne L. K. and Agostini, Valeria and Stewart, Andrew J. and Izydorczak, Kamil and Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah and Hartmann, Helena and Ingham, Madeleine and Yamada, Yuki and Vasilev, Martin R. and Dechterenko, Filip and Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan and Yang, Yu-Fang and LaPlume, Annalise A. and Wolska, Julia K. and Henderson, Emma L. and Zaneva, Mirela and Farrar, Benjamin G. and Mounce, Ross and Kalandadze, Tamara and Li, Wanyin and Xiao, Qinyu and Ross, Robert M. and Yeung, Siu Kit and Liu, Meng and Vandegrift, Micah L. and Kekecs, Zoltan and Topor, Marta K. and Baum, Myriam A. and Williams, Emily A. and Assaneea, Asma A. and Bret, Amélie and Cashin, Aidan G. and Ballou, Nick and Dumbalska, Tsvetomira and Kern, Bettina M. J. and Melia, Claire R. and Arendt, Beatrix and Vineyard, Gerald H. and Pickering, Jade S. and Evans, Thomas R. and Laverty, Catherine and Woodward, Eliza A. and Moreau, David and Roche, Dominique G. and Rinke, Eike M. and Reid, Graham and Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo and Verheyen, Steven and Kocalar, Halil E. and Blake, Ashley R. and Cockcroft, Jamie P. and Micheli, Leticia and Beffara Bret, Brice and Flack, Zoe M. and Szaszi, Barnabas and Weinmann, Markus and Lecuona, Oscar and Schmidt, Birgit and Ngiam, William X. and Mendes, Ana Barbosa and Francis, Shannon and Gall, Brett J. and Paul, Mariella and Keating, Connor T. and Grose-Hodge, Magdalena and Bartlett, James E. and Iley, Bethan J. and Spitzer, Lisa and Pownall, Madeleine and Graham, Christopher J. and Wingen, Tobias and Terry, Jenny and Oliveira, Catia Margarida F. and Millager, Ryan A. and Fox, Kerry J. and AlDoh, Alaa and Hart, Alexander and van den Akker, Olmo R. and Feldman, Gilad and Kiersz, Dominik A. and Pomareda, Christina and Krautter, Kai and Al-Hoorie, Ali H. and Aczel, Balazs",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers.",
journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",
title = "A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms",
pages = "318-312",
number = "3",
volume = "6",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4"
}

Parsons, S., Azevedo, F., Elsherif, M. M., Guay, S., Shahim, O. N., Govaart, G. H., Norris, E., O’Mahony, A., Parker, A. J., Todorovic, A., Pennington, C. R., Garcia-Pelegrin, E., Lazić, A., Robertson, O., Middleton, S. L., Valentini, B., McCuaig, J., Baker, B. J., Collins, E., Fillon, A. A., Lonsdorf, T. B., Lim, M. C., Vanek, N., Kovacs, M., Roettger, T. B., Rishi, S., Miranda, J. F., Jaquiery, M., Stewart, S. L. K., Agostini, V., Stewart, A. J., Izydorczak, K., Ashcroft-Jones, S., Hartmann, H., Ingham, M., Yamada, Y., Vasilev, M. R., Dechterenko, F., Albayrak-Aydemir, N., Yang, Y., LaPlume, A. A., Wolska, J. K., Henderson, E. L., Zaneva, M., Farrar, B. G., Mounce, R., Kalandadze, T., Li, W., Xiao, Q., Ross, R. M., Yeung, S. K., Liu, M., Vandegrift, M. L., Kekecs, Z., Topor, M. K., Baum, M. A., Williams, E. A., Assaneea, A. A., Bret, A., Cashin, A. G., Ballou, N., Dumbalska, T., Kern, B. M. J., Melia, C. R., Arendt, B., Vineyard, G. H., Pickering, J. S., Evans, T. R., Laverty, C., Woodward, E. A., Moreau, D., Roche, D. G., Rinke, E. M., Reid, G., Garcia-Garzon, E., Verheyen, S., Kocalar, H. E., Blake, A. R., Cockcroft, J. P., Micheli, L., Beffara Bret, B., Flack, Z. M., Szaszi, B., Weinmann, M., Lecuona, O., Schmidt, B., Ngiam, W. X., Mendes, A. B., Francis, S., Gall, B. J., Paul, M., Keating, C. T., Grose-Hodge, M., Bartlett, J. E., Iley, B. J., Spitzer, L., Pownall, M., Graham, C. J., Wingen, T., Terry, J., Oliveira, C. M. F., Millager, R. A., Fox, K. J., AlDoh, A., Hart, A., van den Akker, O. R., Feldman, G., Kiersz, D. A., Pomareda, C., Krautter, K., Al-Hoorie, A. H.,& Aczel, B.. (2022). A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. in Nature Human Behaviour, 6(3), 312-318.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4

Parsons S, Azevedo F, Elsherif MM, Guay S, Shahim ON, Govaart GH, Norris E, O’Mahony A, Parker AJ, Todorovic A, Pennington CR, Garcia-Pelegrin E, Lazić A, Robertson O, Middleton SL, Valentini B, McCuaig J, Baker BJ, Collins E, Fillon AA, Lonsdorf TB, Lim MC, Vanek N, Kovacs M, Roettger TB, Rishi S, Miranda JF, Jaquiery M, Stewart SLK, Agostini V, Stewart AJ, Izydorczak K, Ashcroft-Jones S, Hartmann H, Ingham M, Yamada Y, Vasilev MR, Dechterenko F, Albayrak-Aydemir N, Yang Y, LaPlume AA, Wolska JK, Henderson EL, Zaneva M, Farrar BG, Mounce R, Kalandadze T, Li W, Xiao Q, Ross RM, Yeung SK, Liu M, Vandegrift ML, Kekecs Z, Topor MK, Baum MA, Williams EA, Assaneea AA, Bret A, Cashin AG, Ballou N, Dumbalska T, Kern BMJ, Melia CR, Arendt B, Vineyard GH, Pickering JS, Evans TR, Laverty C, Woodward EA, Moreau D, Roche DG, Rinke EM, Reid G, Garcia-Garzon E, Verheyen S, Kocalar HE, Blake AR, Cockcroft JP, Micheli L, Beffara Bret B, Flack ZM, Szaszi B, Weinmann M, Lecuona O, Schmidt B, Ngiam WX, Mendes AB, Francis S, Gall BJ, Paul M, Keating CT, Grose-Hodge M, Bartlett JE, Iley BJ, Spitzer L, Pownall M, Graham CJ, Wingen T, Terry J, Oliveira CMF, Millager RA, Fox KJ, AlDoh A, Hart A, van den Akker OR, Feldman G, Kiersz DA, Pomareda C, Krautter K, Al-Hoorie AH, Aczel B. A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms. in Nature Human Behaviour. 2022;6(3):312-318.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4 .

Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N., Govaart, Gisela H., Norris, Emma, O’Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J., Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R., Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L., Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J., Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A., Lonsdorf, Tina B., Lim, Michele C., Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B., Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F., Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J., Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R., Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A., Wolska, Julia K., Henderson, Emma L., Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G., Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M., Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L., Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K., Baum, Myriam A., Williams, Emily A., Assaneea, Asma A., Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G., Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M. J., Melia, Claire R., Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H., Pickering, Jade S., Evans, Thomas R., Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A., Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G., Rinke, Eike M., Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E., Blake, Ashley R., Cockcroft, Jamie P., Micheli, Leticia, Beffara Bret, Brice, Flack, Zoe M., Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X., Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J., Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T., Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E., Iley, Bethan J., Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J., Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F., Millager, Ryan A., Fox, Kerry J., AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R., Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A., Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Aczel, Balazs, "A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms" in Nature Human Behaviour, 6, no. 3 (2022):312-318,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ruggeri, Kai
AU  - Panin, Amma
AU  - Vdovic, Milica
AU  - Većkalov, Bojana
AU  - Abdul-Salaam, Nazeer
AU  - Achtenberg, Jascha
AU  - Akil, Carla
AU  - Amatya, Jolly
AU  - Amatya, Kanchan
AU  - Andersen, Thomas
AU  - Aquino, Sibele
AU  - Arunasalam, Arjoon
AU  - Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah
AU  - Dahl Askelund, Adrian
AU  - Ayacaxli, Nelida
AU  - Bagheri Sheshdeh, Aseman
AU  - Bailey, Alexander
AU  - Barea Arroyo, Paula
AU  - Basulto Mejia, Genaro
AU  - Benvenuti, Martina
AU  - Berge, Mari Louise
AU  - Bermaganbet, Aliya
AU  - Bibilouri, Katherine
AU  - Bjorndal, Ludvig
AU  - Black, Sabrina
AU  - Blomster Lychol, Johanna
AU  - Brik, Tymofii
AU  - Buabang, Eike Kofi
AU  - Burghart, Matthias
AU  - Bursalioglu, Asli
AU  - Mesfin Buzayu, Naos
AU  - Čadek, Martin
AU  - Melo de Carvalho, Nathalia
AU  - Cazan, Ana-Maria
AU  - Cetincelik, Melis
AU  - Chai, Valentino
AU  - Chen, Patricia
AU  - Chen, Shiyi
AU  - Clay, Georgia
AU  - D'Ambrogio, Simone
AU  - Damjanovic, Kaja
AU  - Duffy, Grace
AU  - Dugue, Tatianna
AU  - Dwarkanath, Twinkle
AU  - Awazzi Envuladu, Esther
AU  - Erceg, Nikola
AU  - Esteban-Serna, Celia
AU  - Farahat, Eman
AU  - Farrokhnia, Robert
AU  - Fawad, Mareyba
AU  - Fedryansyah, Muhammad
AU  - Feng, David
AU  - Filippi, Silvia
AU  - Fonolia, Matias
AU  - Freichel, Rene
AU  - Freira, Lucia
AU  - Freidemann, Maja
AU  - Gao, Ziwei
AU  - Suwan, Ge
AU  - Geiger, Sandra
AU  - George, Leya
AU  - Grabovski, Iulia
AU  - Gracheva, Aleksandra
AU  - Grancheva, Anastasia
AU  - Hajian, Ali
AU  - Hasan, Nida
AU  - Hecht, Marlene
AU  - Hong, Xinyi
AU  - Hubena, Barbora
AU  - Ikonomeas, Alexander
AU  - Ilić, Sandra
AU  - Izydorczyk, David
AU  - Jakob, Lea
AU  - Janssens, Margo
AU  - Jarke, Hannes
AU  - Kacha, Ondrej
AU  - Nikolova Kalinova, Kalina
AU  - Mingiri Kapingura, Forget
AU  - Karakasheva, Ralitsa
AU  - Kasdan, David
AU  - Kemel, Emmanuel
AU  - Khorrami, Peggah
AU  - Krawiec, Jakub
AU  - Lagidze, Nato
AU  - Lazarević, Aleksandra
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Seo Lee, Hyung
AU  - Lep, Žan
AU  - Lins, Samuel
AU  - Lofthus, Ingvild
AU  - Macchia, Lucia
AU  - Mamede, Salome
AU  - Ayele Mamo, Metasebiya
AU  - Maratkyzy, Laura
AU  - Mareva, Silvana
AU  - Marwaha, Shivika
AU  - McGill, Lucy
AU  - McParland, Sharon
AU  - Melnic, Anisoara
AU  - Meyer, Sebastian
AU  - Mizak, Sebastian
AU  - Mohammed, Amina
AU  - Mukhyshbayeva, Aizhan
AU  - Navajas, Joaquin
AU  - Neshevska, Dragana
AU  - Jamali Niazi, Shehrbano
AU  - Nieto, Ana
AU  - Nippold, Franziska
AU  - Oberschulte, Julia
AU  - Otto, Thiago
AU  - Pae, Riinu
AU  - Panchelieva, Tsvetelina
AU  - Young Park, Sun
AU  - Pascu, Daria Stefania
AU  - Pavlović, Irena
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Popović, Dora
AU  - Prinz, Gerhard
AU  - Rachev, Nikolay
AU  - Ranc, Pika
AU  - Razum, Josip
AU  - Eun Rho, Christina
AU  - Riitsalu, Leonore
AU  - Rocca, Federica
AU  - Rosenbaum, Shayna
AU  - Rujimora, James
AU  - Rusyidi, Binahayati
AU  - Rutherford, Charlotte
AU  - Said, Rand
AU  - Sanguino, Ines
AU  - Sarikaya, Ahmet Kerem
AU  - Say, Nicolas
AU  - Jakob, Jakob
AU  - Shiels, Mary
AU  - Shir, Yarden
AU  - Sievert, Elisabeth D.C.
AU  - Soboleva, Irina
AU  - Solomonia, Tina
AU  - Soni, Siddhant
AU  - Soysal, Irem
AU  - Stablum, Federica
AU  - Sundstrom, Felicia T.A.
AU  - Tang, Xintong
AU  - Tavera, Felice
AU  - Taylor, Jacqueline
AU  - Tebbe, Anna-Lena
AU  - Thommesen, Katrine
AU  - Tobbias-Webb, Juliette
AU  - Todsen, Anna
AU  - Toscano, Filippo
AU  - Tran, Tran
AU  - Trinh, Jason
AU  - Turati, Alice
AU  - Ueda, Kohei
AU  - Vacondio, Martina
AU  - Vakhitov, Volodymyr
AU  - Valencia, Adrianna
AU  - van Reyn, Chiara
AU  - Venema, Tina
AU  - Verra, Sanne
AU  - Vintr, Jachym
AU  - Vranka, Marek
AU  - Wagner, Lisa
AU  - Wu, Xue
AU  - Ying Xing, Ke
AU  - Xu, Kailin
AU  - Xu, Sonya
AU  - Yamada, Yuki
AU  - Yosifova, Aleksandra
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3994
AB  - Economic inequality is associated with preferences for smaller, immediate gains over larger, delayed ones. Such temporal discounting may feed into rising global inequality, yet it is unclear whether it is a function of choice preferences or norms, or rather the absence of sufficient resources for immediate needs. It is also not clear whether these reflect true differences in choice patterns between income groups. We tested temporal discounting and five intertemporal choice anomalies using local currencies and value standards in 61 countries (N = 13,629). Across a diverse sample, we found consistent, robust rates of choice anomalies. Lower-income groups were not significantly different, but economic inequality and broader financial circumstances were clearly correlated with population choice patterns.
PB  - Nature Human Behaviour
T2  - Nature Human Behavior
T1  - The globalizability of temporal discounting
EP  - 1397
IS  - 6
SP  - 1386
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01392-w
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ruggeri, Kai and Panin, Amma and Vdovic, Milica and Većkalov, Bojana and Abdul-Salaam, Nazeer and Achtenberg, Jascha and Akil, Carla and Amatya, Jolly and Amatya, Kanchan and Andersen, Thomas and Aquino, Sibele and Arunasalam, Arjoon and Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah and Dahl Askelund, Adrian and Ayacaxli, Nelida and Bagheri Sheshdeh, Aseman and Bailey, Alexander and Barea Arroyo, Paula and Basulto Mejia, Genaro and Benvenuti, Martina and Berge, Mari Louise and Bermaganbet, Aliya and Bibilouri, Katherine and Bjorndal, Ludvig and Black, Sabrina and Blomster Lychol, Johanna and Brik, Tymofii and Buabang, Eike Kofi and Burghart, Matthias and Bursalioglu, Asli and Mesfin Buzayu, Naos and Čadek, Martin and Melo de Carvalho, Nathalia and Cazan, Ana-Maria and Cetincelik, Melis and Chai, Valentino and Chen, Patricia and Chen, Shiyi and Clay, Georgia and D'Ambrogio, Simone and Damjanovic, Kaja and Duffy, Grace and Dugue, Tatianna and Dwarkanath, Twinkle and Awazzi Envuladu, Esther and Erceg, Nikola and Esteban-Serna, Celia and Farahat, Eman and Farrokhnia, Robert and Fawad, Mareyba and Fedryansyah, Muhammad and Feng, David and Filippi, Silvia and Fonolia, Matias and Freichel, Rene and Freira, Lucia and Freidemann, Maja and Gao, Ziwei and Suwan, Ge and Geiger, Sandra and George, Leya and Grabovski, Iulia and Gracheva, Aleksandra and Grancheva, Anastasia and Hajian, Ali and Hasan, Nida and Hecht, Marlene and Hong, Xinyi and Hubena, Barbora and Ikonomeas, Alexander and Ilić, Sandra and Izydorczyk, David and Jakob, Lea and Janssens, Margo and Jarke, Hannes and Kacha, Ondrej and Nikolova Kalinova, Kalina and Mingiri Kapingura, Forget and Karakasheva, Ralitsa and Kasdan, David and Kemel, Emmanuel and Khorrami, Peggah and Krawiec, Jakub and Lagidze, Nato and Lazarević, Aleksandra and Lazić, Aleksandra and Seo Lee, Hyung and Lep, Žan and Lins, Samuel and Lofthus, Ingvild and Macchia, Lucia and Mamede, Salome and Ayele Mamo, Metasebiya and Maratkyzy, Laura and Mareva, Silvana and Marwaha, Shivika and McGill, Lucy and McParland, Sharon and Melnic, Anisoara and Meyer, Sebastian and Mizak, Sebastian and Mohammed, Amina and Mukhyshbayeva, Aizhan and Navajas, Joaquin and Neshevska, Dragana and Jamali Niazi, Shehrbano and Nieto, Ana and Nippold, Franziska and Oberschulte, Julia and Otto, Thiago and Pae, Riinu and Panchelieva, Tsvetelina and Young Park, Sun and Pascu, Daria Stefania and Pavlović, Irena and Petrović, Marija and Popović, Dora and Prinz, Gerhard and Rachev, Nikolay and Ranc, Pika and Razum, Josip and Eun Rho, Christina and Riitsalu, Leonore and Rocca, Federica and Rosenbaum, Shayna and Rujimora, James and Rusyidi, Binahayati and Rutherford, Charlotte and Said, Rand and Sanguino, Ines and Sarikaya, Ahmet Kerem and Say, Nicolas and Jakob, Jakob and Shiels, Mary and Shir, Yarden and Sievert, Elisabeth D.C. and Soboleva, Irina and Solomonia, Tina and Soni, Siddhant and Soysal, Irem and Stablum, Federica and Sundstrom, Felicia T.A. and Tang, Xintong and Tavera, Felice and Taylor, Jacqueline and Tebbe, Anna-Lena and Thommesen, Katrine and Tobbias-Webb, Juliette and Todsen, Anna and Toscano, Filippo and Tran, Tran and Trinh, Jason and Turati, Alice and Ueda, Kohei and Vacondio, Martina and Vakhitov, Volodymyr and Valencia, Adrianna and van Reyn, Chiara and Venema, Tina and Verra, Sanne and Vintr, Jachym and Vranka, Marek and Wagner, Lisa and Wu, Xue and Ying Xing, Ke and Xu, Kailin and Xu, Sonya and Yamada, Yuki and Yosifova, Aleksandra and Zupan, Zorana and Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Economic inequality is associated with preferences for smaller, immediate gains over larger, delayed ones. Such temporal discounting may feed into rising global inequality, yet it is unclear whether it is a function of choice preferences or norms, or rather the absence of sufficient resources for immediate needs. It is also not clear whether these reflect true differences in choice patterns between income groups. We tested temporal discounting and five intertemporal choice anomalies using local currencies and value standards in 61 countries (N = 13,629). Across a diverse sample, we found consistent, robust rates of choice anomalies. Lower-income groups were not significantly different, but economic inequality and broader financial circumstances were clearly correlated with population choice patterns.",
publisher = "Nature Human Behaviour",
journal = "Nature Human Behavior",
title = "The globalizability of temporal discounting",
pages = "1397-1386",
number = "6",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01392-w"
}

Ruggeri, K., Panin, A., Vdovic, M., Većkalov, B., Abdul-Salaam, N., Achtenberg, J., Akil, C., Amatya, J., Amatya, K., Andersen, T., Aquino, S., Arunasalam, A., Ashcroft-Jones, S., Dahl Askelund, A., Ayacaxli, N., Bagheri Sheshdeh, A., Bailey, A., Barea Arroyo, P., Basulto Mejia, G., Benvenuti, M., Berge, M. L., Bermaganbet, A., Bibilouri, K., Bjorndal, L., Black, S., Blomster Lychol, J., Brik, T., Buabang, E. K., Burghart, M., Bursalioglu, A., Mesfin Buzayu, N., Čadek, M., Melo de Carvalho, N., Cazan, A., Cetincelik, M., Chai, V., Chen, P., Chen, S., Clay, G., D'Ambrogio, S., Damjanovic, K., Duffy, G., Dugue, T., Dwarkanath, T., Awazzi Envuladu, E., Erceg, N., Esteban-Serna, C., Farahat, E., Farrokhnia, R., Fawad, M., Fedryansyah, M., Feng, D., Filippi, S., Fonolia, M., Freichel, R., Freira, L., Freidemann, M., Gao, Z., Suwan, G., Geiger, S., George, L., Grabovski, I., Gracheva, A., Grancheva, A., Hajian, A., Hasan, N., Hecht, M., Hong, X., Hubena, B., Ikonomeas, A., Ilić, S., Izydorczyk, D., Jakob, L., Janssens, M., Jarke, H., Kacha, O., Nikolova Kalinova, K., Mingiri Kapingura, F., Karakasheva, R., Kasdan, D., Kemel, E., Khorrami, P., Krawiec, J., Lagidze, N., Lazarević, A., Lazić, A., Seo Lee, H., Lep, Ž., Lins, S., Lofthus, I., Macchia, L., Mamede, S., Ayele Mamo, M., Maratkyzy, L., Mareva, S., Marwaha, S., McGill, L., McParland, S., Melnic, A., Meyer, S., Mizak, S., Mohammed, A., Mukhyshbayeva, A., Navajas, J., Neshevska, D., Jamali Niazi, S., Nieto, A., Nippold, F., Oberschulte, J., Otto, T., Pae, R., Panchelieva, T., Young Park, S., Pascu, D. S., Pavlović, I., Petrović, M., Popović, D., Prinz, G., Rachev, N., Ranc, P., Razum, J., Eun Rho, C., Riitsalu, L., Rocca, F., Rosenbaum, S., Rujimora, J., Rusyidi, B., Rutherford, C., Said, R., Sanguino, I., Sarikaya, A. K., Say, N., Jakob, J., Shiels, M., Shir, Y., Sievert, E. D.C., Soboleva, I., Solomonia, T., Soni, S., Soysal, I., Stablum, F., Sundstrom, F. T.A., Tang, X., Tavera, F., Taylor, J., Tebbe, A., Thommesen, K., Tobbias-Webb, J., Todsen, A., Toscano, F., Tran, T., Trinh, J., Turati, A., Ueda, K., Vacondio, M., Vakhitov, V., Valencia, A., van Reyn, C., Venema, T., Verra, S., Vintr, J., Vranka, M., Wagner, L., Wu, X., Ying Xing, K., Xu, K., Xu, S., Yamada, Y., Yosifova, A., Zupan, Z.,& Garcia-Garzon, E.. (2022). The globalizability of temporal discounting. in Nature Human Behavior
Nature Human Behaviour.(6), 1386-1397.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01392-w

Ruggeri K, Panin A, Vdovic M, Većkalov B, Abdul-Salaam N, Achtenberg J, Akil C, Amatya J, Amatya K, Andersen T, Aquino S, Arunasalam A, Ashcroft-Jones S, Dahl Askelund A, Ayacaxli N, Bagheri Sheshdeh A, Bailey A, Barea Arroyo P, Basulto Mejia G, Benvenuti M, Berge ML, Bermaganbet A, Bibilouri K, Bjorndal L, Black S, Blomster Lychol J, Brik T, Buabang EK, Burghart M, Bursalioglu A, Mesfin Buzayu N, Čadek M, Melo de Carvalho N, Cazan A, Cetincelik M, Chai V, Chen P, Chen S, Clay G, D'Ambrogio S, Damjanovic K, Duffy G, Dugue T, Dwarkanath T, Awazzi Envuladu E, Erceg N, Esteban-Serna C, Farahat E, Farrokhnia R, Fawad M, Fedryansyah M, Feng D, Filippi S, Fonolia M, Freichel R, Freira L, Freidemann M, Gao Z, Suwan G, Geiger S, George L, Grabovski I, Gracheva A, Grancheva A, Hajian A, Hasan N, Hecht M, Hong X, Hubena B, Ikonomeas A, Ilić S, Izydorczyk D, Jakob L, Janssens M, Jarke H, Kacha O, Nikolova Kalinova K, Mingiri Kapingura F, Karakasheva R, Kasdan D, Kemel E, Khorrami P, Krawiec J, Lagidze N, Lazarević A, Lazić A, Seo Lee H, Lep Ž, Lins S, Lofthus I, Macchia L, Mamede S, Ayele Mamo M, Maratkyzy L, Mareva S, Marwaha S, McGill L, McParland S, Melnic A, Meyer S, Mizak S, Mohammed A, Mukhyshbayeva A, Navajas J, Neshevska D, Jamali Niazi S, Nieto A, Nippold F, Oberschulte J, Otto T, Pae R, Panchelieva T, Young Park S, Pascu DS, Pavlović I, Petrović M, Popović D, Prinz G, Rachev N, Ranc P, Razum J, Eun Rho C, Riitsalu L, Rocca F, Rosenbaum S, Rujimora J, Rusyidi B, Rutherford C, Said R, Sanguino I, Sarikaya AK, Say N, Jakob J, Shiels M, Shir Y, Sievert ED, Soboleva I, Solomonia T, Soni S, Soysal I, Stablum F, Sundstrom FT, Tang X, Tavera F, Taylor J, Tebbe A, Thommesen K, Tobbias-Webb J, Todsen A, Toscano F, Tran T, Trinh J, Turati A, Ueda K, Vacondio M, Vakhitov V, Valencia A, van Reyn C, Venema T, Verra S, Vintr J, Vranka M, Wagner L, Wu X, Ying Xing K, Xu K, Xu S, Yamada Y, Yosifova A, Zupan Z, Garcia-Garzon E. The globalizability of temporal discounting. in Nature Human Behavior. 2022;(6):1386-1397.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01392-w .

Ruggeri, Kai, Panin, Amma, Vdovic, Milica, Većkalov, Bojana, Abdul-Salaam, Nazeer, Achtenberg, Jascha, Akil, Carla, Amatya, Jolly, Amatya, Kanchan, Andersen, Thomas, Aquino, Sibele, Arunasalam, Arjoon, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Dahl Askelund, Adrian, Ayacaxli, Nelida, Bagheri Sheshdeh, Aseman, Bailey, Alexander, Barea Arroyo, Paula, Basulto Mejia, Genaro, Benvenuti, Martina, Berge, Mari Louise, Bermaganbet, Aliya, Bibilouri, Katherine, Bjorndal, Ludvig, Black, Sabrina, Blomster Lychol, Johanna, Brik, Tymofii, Buabang, Eike Kofi, Burghart, Matthias, Bursalioglu, Asli, Mesfin Buzayu, Naos, Čadek, Martin, Melo de Carvalho, Nathalia, Cazan, Ana-Maria, Cetincelik, Melis, Chai, Valentino, Chen, Patricia, Chen, Shiyi, Clay, Georgia, D'Ambrogio, Simone, Damjanovic, Kaja, Duffy, Grace, Dugue, Tatianna, Dwarkanath, Twinkle, Awazzi Envuladu, Esther, Erceg, Nikola, Esteban-Serna, Celia, Farahat, Eman, Farrokhnia, Robert, Fawad, Mareyba, Fedryansyah, Muhammad, Feng, David, Filippi, Silvia, Fonolia, Matias, Freichel, Rene, Freira, Lucia, Freidemann, Maja, Gao, Ziwei, Suwan, Ge, Geiger, Sandra, George, Leya, Grabovski, Iulia, Gracheva, Aleksandra, Grancheva, Anastasia, Hajian, Ali, Hasan, Nida, Hecht, Marlene, Hong, Xinyi, Hubena, Barbora, Ikonomeas, Alexander, Ilić, Sandra, Izydorczyk, David, Jakob, Lea, Janssens, Margo, Jarke, Hannes, Kacha, Ondrej, Nikolova Kalinova, Kalina, Mingiri Kapingura, Forget, Karakasheva, Ralitsa, Kasdan, David, Kemel, Emmanuel, Khorrami, Peggah, Krawiec, Jakub, Lagidze, Nato, Lazarević, Aleksandra, Lazić, Aleksandra, Seo Lee, Hyung, Lep, Žan, Lins, Samuel, Lofthus, Ingvild, Macchia, Lucia, Mamede, Salome, Ayele Mamo, Metasebiya, Maratkyzy, Laura, Mareva, Silvana, Marwaha, Shivika, McGill, Lucy, McParland, Sharon, Melnic, Anisoara, Meyer, Sebastian, Mizak, Sebastian, Mohammed, Amina, Mukhyshbayeva, Aizhan, Navajas, Joaquin, Neshevska, Dragana, Jamali Niazi, Shehrbano, Nieto, Ana, Nippold, Franziska, Oberschulte, Julia, Otto, Thiago, Pae, Riinu, Panchelieva, Tsvetelina, Young Park, Sun, Pascu, Daria Stefania, Pavlović, Irena, Petrović, Marija, Popović, Dora, Prinz, Gerhard, Rachev, Nikolay, Ranc, Pika, Razum, Josip, Eun Rho, Christina, Riitsalu, Leonore, Rocca, Federica, Rosenbaum, Shayna, Rujimora, James, Rusyidi, Binahayati, Rutherford, Charlotte, Said, Rand, Sanguino, Ines, Sarikaya, Ahmet Kerem, Say, Nicolas, Jakob, Jakob, Shiels, Mary, Shir, Yarden, Sievert, Elisabeth D.C., Soboleva, Irina, Solomonia, Tina, Soni, Siddhant, Soysal, Irem, Stablum, Federica, Sundstrom, Felicia T.A., Tang, Xintong, Tavera, Felice, Taylor, Jacqueline, Tebbe, Anna-Lena, Thommesen, Katrine, Tobbias-Webb, Juliette, Todsen, Anna, Toscano, Filippo, Tran, Tran, Trinh, Jason, Turati, Alice, Ueda, Kohei, Vacondio, Martina, Vakhitov, Volodymyr, Valencia, Adrianna, van Reyn, Chiara, Venema, Tina, Verra, Sanne, Vintr, Jachym, Vranka, Marek, Wagner, Lisa, Wu, Xue, Ying Xing, Ke, Xu, Kailin, Xu, Sonya, Yamada, Yuki, Yosifova, Aleksandra, Zupan, Zorana, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, "The globalizability of temporal discounting" in Nature Human Behavior, no. 6 (2022):1386-1397,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01392-w . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teovanović, Predrag
AU  - Lukić, Petar
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Ninković, Milica
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3355
AB  - In the coronavirus "infodemic," people are exposed to official recommendations but also to potentially dangerous pseudoscientific advice claimed to protect against COVID-19. We examined whether irrational beliefs predict adherence to COVID-19 guidelines as well as susceptibility to such misinformation. Irrational beliefs were indexed by belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, COVID-19 knowledge overestimation, type I error cognitive biases, and cognitive intuition. Participants (N = 407) reported (1) how often they followed guidelines (e.g., handwashing, physical distancing), (2) how often they engaged in pseudoscientific practices (e.g., consuming garlic, colloidal silver), and (3) their intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Conspiratorial beliefs predicted all three outcomes in line with our expectations. Cognitive intuition and knowledge overestimation predicted lesser adherence to guidelines, while cognitive biases predicted greater adherence, but also greater use of pseudoscientific practices. Our results suggest an important relation between irrational beliefs and health behaviors, with conspiracy theories being the most detrimental.
PB  - Wiley, Hoboken
T2  - Applied Cognitive Psychology
T1  - Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic
EP  - 496
IS  - 2
SP  - 486
VL  - 35
DO  - 10.1002/acp.3770
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Teovanović, Predrag and Lukić, Petar and Zupan, Zorana and Lazić, Aleksandra and Ninković, Milica and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In the coronavirus "infodemic," people are exposed to official recommendations but also to potentially dangerous pseudoscientific advice claimed to protect against COVID-19. We examined whether irrational beliefs predict adherence to COVID-19 guidelines as well as susceptibility to such misinformation. Irrational beliefs were indexed by belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, COVID-19 knowledge overestimation, type I error cognitive biases, and cognitive intuition. Participants (N = 407) reported (1) how often they followed guidelines (e.g., handwashing, physical distancing), (2) how often they engaged in pseudoscientific practices (e.g., consuming garlic, colloidal silver), and (3) their intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Conspiratorial beliefs predicted all three outcomes in line with our expectations. Cognitive intuition and knowledge overestimation predicted lesser adherence to guidelines, while cognitive biases predicted greater adherence, but also greater use of pseudoscientific practices. Our results suggest an important relation between irrational beliefs and health behaviors, with conspiracy theories being the most detrimental.",
publisher = "Wiley, Hoboken",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
title = "Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic",
pages = "496-486",
number = "2",
volume = "35",
doi = "10.1002/acp.3770"
}

Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., Lazić, A., Ninković, M.,& Žeželj, I.. (2021). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. in Applied Cognitive Psychology
Wiley, Hoboken., 35(2), 486-496.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770

Teovanović P, Lukić P, Zupan Z, Lazić A, Ninković M, Žeželj I. Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. in Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2021;35(2):486-496.
doi:10.1002/acp.3770 .

Teovanović, Predrag, Lukić, Petar, Zupan, Zorana, Lazić, Aleksandra, Ninković, Milica, Žeželj, Iris, "Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic" in Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, no. 2 (2021):486-496,
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Kalinova, Kalina Nikolova
AU  - Packer, Jali
AU  - Pae, Riinu
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Popović, Dora
AU  - Sievert, D. Elisabeth C.
AU  - Stafford-Johnson, Natalie
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3278
AB  - Objectives This Registered Report attempted to conceptually replicate the finding that communicating herd immunity increases vaccination intentions (Betsch, et al., 2017, Nat. Hum. Behav., 0056). An additional objective was to explore the roles of descriptive social norms (vaccination behaviour of others) and the herd-immunity threshold (coverage needed to stop disease transmission). Design An online experiment with a 2 (herd-immunity explanation: present vs. absent) x 3 (descriptive norm: high vs. low vs. absent) x 2 (herd-immunity threshold: present vs. absent) between-subjects fractional design. Methods Sample consisted of 543 people (aged 18-64) residing in the United Kingdom. Participants first received an explanation of herd immunity emphasising social benefits (protecting others) in both textual and animated-infographic form. Next, they were faced with fictitious information about the disease, the vaccine, their country's vaccination coverage (80% or 20%), and the herd-immunity threshold (90%). Vaccination intention was self-rated. Results Compared to the control, communicating social benefits of herd immunity was effective in increasing vaccination intentions (F(1,541) = 6.97, p = .009, Partial Eta-Squared = 0.013). Communicating the descriptive norm or the herd-immunity threshold alongside the herd-immunity explanation demonstrated no observable effect. Conclusion Communicating social benefits of herd immunity increased self-reported vaccination intentions against a fictitious disease, replicating previous findings. Although this result is positive, the practical relevance may be limited. Further research into the effect of social nudges to motivate vaccination is required, particularly with respect to the recent pandemic context and varying levels of vaccine hesitancy.
PB  - Wiley, Hoboken
T2  - British Journal of Health Psychology
T1  - Social nudges for vaccination: How communicating herd behaviour influences vaccination intentions
DO  - 10.1111/bjhp.12556
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Kalinova, Kalina Nikolova and Packer, Jali and Pae, Riinu and Petrović, Marija and Popović, Dora and Sievert, D. Elisabeth C. and Stafford-Johnson, Natalie",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Objectives This Registered Report attempted to conceptually replicate the finding that communicating herd immunity increases vaccination intentions (Betsch, et al., 2017, Nat. Hum. Behav., 0056). An additional objective was to explore the roles of descriptive social norms (vaccination behaviour of others) and the herd-immunity threshold (coverage needed to stop disease transmission). Design An online experiment with a 2 (herd-immunity explanation: present vs. absent) x 3 (descriptive norm: high vs. low vs. absent) x 2 (herd-immunity threshold: present vs. absent) between-subjects fractional design. Methods Sample consisted of 543 people (aged 18-64) residing in the United Kingdom. Participants first received an explanation of herd immunity emphasising social benefits (protecting others) in both textual and animated-infographic form. Next, they were faced with fictitious information about the disease, the vaccine, their country's vaccination coverage (80% or 20%), and the herd-immunity threshold (90%). Vaccination intention was self-rated. Results Compared to the control, communicating social benefits of herd immunity was effective in increasing vaccination intentions (F(1,541) = 6.97, p = .009, Partial Eta-Squared = 0.013). Communicating the descriptive norm or the herd-immunity threshold alongside the herd-immunity explanation demonstrated no observable effect. Conclusion Communicating social benefits of herd immunity increased self-reported vaccination intentions against a fictitious disease, replicating previous findings. Although this result is positive, the practical relevance may be limited. Further research into the effect of social nudges to motivate vaccination is required, particularly with respect to the recent pandemic context and varying levels of vaccine hesitancy.",
publisher = "Wiley, Hoboken",
journal = "British Journal of Health Psychology",
title = "Social nudges for vaccination: How communicating herd behaviour influences vaccination intentions",
doi = "10.1111/bjhp.12556"
}

Lazić, A., Kalinova, K. N., Packer, J., Pae, R., Petrović, M., Popović, D., Sievert, D. E. C.,& Stafford-Johnson, N.. (2021). Social nudges for vaccination: How communicating herd behaviour influences vaccination intentions. in British Journal of Health Psychology
Wiley, Hoboken..
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12556

Lazić A, Kalinova KN, Packer J, Pae R, Petrović M, Popović D, Sievert DEC, Stafford-Johnson N. Social nudges for vaccination: How communicating herd behaviour influences vaccination intentions. in British Journal of Health Psychology. 2021;.
doi:10.1111/bjhp.12556 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Kalinova, Kalina Nikolova, Packer, Jali, Pae, Riinu, Petrović, Marija, Popović, Dora, Sievert, D. Elisabeth C., Stafford-Johnson, Natalie, "Social nudges for vaccination: How communicating herd behaviour influences vaccination intentions" in British Journal of Health Psychology (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12556 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Purić, Danka
AU  - Krstić, Ksenija
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3248
AB  - Although previous meta-analytic evidence supports the existence of parochialism in cooperation among adults, the extent to which children and adolescents are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroups, compared to outgroups, is not yet clear. We provide the first meta-analysis on the existence and magnitude of parochialism in cooperation among pre-adults. Based on 20 experimental economics studies (k = 69, N = 5268, age = 3-19, 12 countries, published 2008-2019), a multilevel meta-analytic model revealed a small overall effect size indicating that children and adolescents were more cooperative towards ingroups (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.07, 0.38]). A series of single-moderator analyses tested for the following conditions: participant age and sex; game type ([mini-]dictator game, prisoner's dilemma, public goods dilemma, trust game, ultimatum game); outcome interdependence; membership manipulation (between- vs. within-subjects); group type (natural vs. experimental); reward type (monetary vs. non-monetary); and country of the participant. Parochial cooperation did not vary with participants' age. Parochialism was larger in non-interdependent (dictator-type) compared to interdependent (bargaining and social dilemma) games. There were no moderating effects of group type, membership manipulation or reward type. To provide more data on how parochialism develops, primary studies should report age ranges more precisely and use more restricted age groups.
PB  - John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
T2  - International Journal of Psychology
T1  - Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis
DO  - 10.1002/ijop.12791
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Purić, Danka and Krstić, Ksenija",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Although previous meta-analytic evidence supports the existence of parochialism in cooperation among adults, the extent to which children and adolescents are more willing to incur a personal cost to benefit ingroups, compared to outgroups, is not yet clear. We provide the first meta-analysis on the existence and magnitude of parochialism in cooperation among pre-adults. Based on 20 experimental economics studies (k = 69, N = 5268, age = 3-19, 12 countries, published 2008-2019), a multilevel meta-analytic model revealed a small overall effect size indicating that children and adolescents were more cooperative towards ingroups (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.07, 0.38]). A series of single-moderator analyses tested for the following conditions: participant age and sex; game type ([mini-]dictator game, prisoner's dilemma, public goods dilemma, trust game, ultimatum game); outcome interdependence; membership manipulation (between- vs. within-subjects); group type (natural vs. experimental); reward type (monetary vs. non-monetary); and country of the participant. Parochial cooperation did not vary with participants' age. Parochialism was larger in non-interdependent (dictator-type) compared to interdependent (bargaining and social dilemma) games. There were no moderating effects of group type, membership manipulation or reward type. To provide more data on how parochialism develops, primary studies should report age ranges more precisely and use more restricted age groups.",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester",
journal = "International Journal of Psychology",
title = "Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis",
doi = "10.1002/ijop.12791"
}

Lazić, A., Purić, D.,& Krstić, K.. (2021). Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis. in International Journal of Psychology
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester..
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12791

Lazić A, Purić D, Krstić K. Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis. in International Journal of Psychology. 2021;.
doi:10.1002/ijop.12791 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Purić, Danka, Krstić, Ksenija, "Does parochial cooperation exist in childhood and adolescence? A meta-analysis" in International Journal of Psychology (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12791 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://2021.ehps.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EHPS-2021-Book-of-Abstarcts-V1.pdf
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4331
AB  - Background: The media can frame vaccination uptake negatively (e.g., as “low” or “poor”), appealing to fear to motivate people to get vaccinated. However, according to the descriptive norms theory, this could backfire. Public communication should instead highlight positive static (“most people are vaccinated”) or dynamic norms (“more and more people are getting vaccinated”). Additionally, communicating herd immunity (if enough people have immunity through vaccination, the virus is contained) could signal the importance of high vaccination uptake. Methods: We conducted a quantitative content analysis of all articles on vaccines and vaccination (N=160) published between July 1 and December 31, 2017 (during the measles outbreak) by nine highest-trafficked news websites in Serbia. Findings: Half of the articles (53.75%) included vaccination rates, mentioning them 339 times. Vaccination rates were usually on a country- (41.30%) or city-level (31.56%) and sourced from national/local health experts and organizations (64.31%). Rates communicated both static (71.09%) and dynamic (28.91%) norms, which were negatively framed 72.61% and 68.37% of the time, respectively. The numerical value of the vaccination rate was not provided in 42.18% of the cases. Out of the 32 articles mentioning the term “herd/collective immunity”, 11 gave the full definition of this effect. The critical immunity threshold (e.g., 90-95% for measles) was provided in 37 articles. Discussion: To report effectively and ethically, the Serbian online news media should focus readers’ attention on positive trends in vaccination and provide precise vaccination rate values. Information on vaccination uptake should be accompanied with an explanation of herd immunity through vaccination.
C3  - 35th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society
T1  - News media framing of vaccination uptake and herd immunity: A content analysis
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4331
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Background: The media can frame vaccination uptake negatively (e.g., as “low” or “poor”), appealing to fear to motivate people to get vaccinated. However, according to the descriptive norms theory, this could backfire. Public communication should instead highlight positive static (“most people are vaccinated”) or dynamic norms (“more and more people are getting vaccinated”). Additionally, communicating herd immunity (if enough people have immunity through vaccination, the virus is contained) could signal the importance of high vaccination uptake. Methods: We conducted a quantitative content analysis of all articles on vaccines and vaccination (N=160) published between July 1 and December 31, 2017 (during the measles outbreak) by nine highest-trafficked news websites in Serbia. Findings: Half of the articles (53.75%) included vaccination rates, mentioning them 339 times. Vaccination rates were usually on a country- (41.30%) or city-level (31.56%) and sourced from national/local health experts and organizations (64.31%). Rates communicated both static (71.09%) and dynamic (28.91%) norms, which were negatively framed 72.61% and 68.37% of the time, respectively. The numerical value of the vaccination rate was not provided in 42.18% of the cases. Out of the 32 articles mentioning the term “herd/collective immunity”, 11 gave the full definition of this effect. The critical immunity threshold (e.g., 90-95% for measles) was provided in 37 articles. Discussion: To report effectively and ethically, the Serbian online news media should focus readers’ attention on positive trends in vaccination and provide precise vaccination rate values. Information on vaccination uptake should be accompanied with an explanation of herd immunity through vaccination.",
journal = "35th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society",
title = "News media framing of vaccination uptake and herd immunity: A content analysis",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4331"
}

Lazić, A.,& Žeželj, I.. (2021). News media framing of vaccination uptake and herd immunity: A content analysis. in 35th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4331

Lazić A, Žeželj I. News media framing of vaccination uptake and herd immunity: A content analysis. in 35th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society. 2021;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4331 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Žeželj, Iris, "News media framing of vaccination uptake and herd immunity: A content analysis" in 35th Annual Conference of the European Health Psychology Society (2021),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_4331 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lazić, Aleksandra
AU  - Žeželj, Iris
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3333
AB  - Even if a small portion of the population refuses vaccination due to anti-vaccination conspiracy theories or misinformation, this poses a threat to public health. We argue that addressing conspiracy theories with only corrective information is not enough. Instead, considering that they are complex narratives embedded in personal and cultural worldviews, they should be encountered with counternarratives. To identify existing narrative interventions aimed at countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and, more generally, map prerequisites for a narrative intervention to be successful, we present a systematic review of experimental effects of exposure to pro-vaccine narratives on a range of vaccination outcomes, based on 17 studies and 97 comparisons. We did not find any narrative interventions aimed directly at conspiracy theories. However, the review allowed us to make evidence-based recommendations for future research and for public communicators. This might help pro-vaccine communication match anti-vaccine communication in its potential to spread and go viral.
PB  - Sage Publications Ltd, London
T2  - Public Understanding of Science
T1  - A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation
EP  - 670
IS  - 6
SP  - 644
VL  - 30
DO  - 10.1177/09636625211011881
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Lazić, Aleksandra and Žeželj, Iris",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Even if a small portion of the population refuses vaccination due to anti-vaccination conspiracy theories or misinformation, this poses a threat to public health. We argue that addressing conspiracy theories with only corrective information is not enough. Instead, considering that they are complex narratives embedded in personal and cultural worldviews, they should be encountered with counternarratives. To identify existing narrative interventions aimed at countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and, more generally, map prerequisites for a narrative intervention to be successful, we present a systematic review of experimental effects of exposure to pro-vaccine narratives on a range of vaccination outcomes, based on 17 studies and 97 comparisons. We did not find any narrative interventions aimed directly at conspiracy theories. However, the review allowed us to make evidence-based recommendations for future research and for public communicators. This might help pro-vaccine communication match anti-vaccine communication in its potential to spread and go viral.",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd, London",
journal = "Public Understanding of Science",
title = "A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation",
pages = "670-644",
number = "6",
volume = "30",
doi = "10.1177/09636625211011881"
}

Lazić, A.,& Žeželj, I.. (2021). A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation. in Public Understanding of Science
Sage Publications Ltd, London., 30(6), 644-670.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211011881

Lazić A, Žeželj I. A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation. in Public Understanding of Science. 2021;30(6):644-670.
doi:10.1177/09636625211011881 .

Lazić, Aleksandra, Žeželj, Iris, "A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation" in Public Understanding of Science, 30, no. 6 (2021):644-670,
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211011881 . .