TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ruggeri, Kai
AU  - Stock, Friederike
AU  - Haslam, Alexander S.
AU  - Capraro, Valerio
AU  - Boggio, P.
AU  - Ellemers, N.
AU  - Cichocka, A.
AU  - Douglas, Karen  M.
AU  - Rand, David G.
AU  - van der Linden, Sander
AU  - Cikara, Mina
AU  - Finkel, Eli J.
AU  - Druckman, James N.
AU  - Wohl, Michael J.A.
AU  - Petty, Richard E.
AU  - Tucker, Joshua A.
AU  - Shariff, Azim
AU  - Gelfand, M.
AU  - Packer, Dominic
AU  - Jetten, Jolanda
AU  - Van Lange, Paul AM
AU  - Pennycook, Gordon
AU  - Peters, Ellen
AU  - Baicker, Katherine
AU  - Crum, Alia
AU  - Weeden, Kim A
AU  - Napper, Lucy
AU  - Tabri, Nassim
AU  - Zaki, Jamil
AU  - Skitka, Linda
AU  - Kitayama, Shinobu
AU  - Mobbs, Dean
AU  - Sunstein, Cass R
AU  - Ashcroft Jones, Sarah
AU  - Todsen, Anna Louise
AU  - Hajian, Ali
AU  - Verra, Sanne
AU  - Buehler, Vanessa
AU  - Friedemann, Maja
AU  - Hecht, Marlene
AU  - Mobarak, Rayyan S
AU  - Karakasheva, Ralitsa
AU  - Tunte, Markus R
AU  - Yeung, Siu Kit
AU  - Rosenbaum, R Shayna
AU  - Lep, Žan
AU  - Yamada, Yuki
AU  - Hudson, Sa-Kiera Tiarra Jolynn
AU  - Macchia, Lucia
AU  - Soboleva, Irina
AU  - Dimant, Eugen
AU  - Geiger, Sandra J.
AU  - Jarke, Hannes
AU  - Wingen, Tobias
AU  - Berkessel, Jana B
AU  - Mareva, Silvana
AU  - McGill, Lucy
AU  - Papa, Francesca
AU  - Veckalov, Bojana
AU  - Afif, Zeina
AU  - Buabang, Eike K
AU  - Landman, Marna
AU  - Tavera, Felice
AU  - Andrews, Jack L.
AU  - Bursalioglu, Asli
AU  - Zupan, Zorana
AU  - Wagner, Lisa
AU  - Navajas, Joaquin
AU  - Vranka, Marek
AU  - Kasdan, David
AU  - Chen, Patricia
AU  - Hudson, Kathleen R
AU  - Novak, Lindsay M
AU  - Teas, Paul
AU  - Rachev, Nikolay R
AU  - Galizzi, Matteo M
AU  - Milknan, Katherine L
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - van Bavel, Jay J
AU  - Willer, Robb
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/6015
AB  - Scientific evidence regularly guides policy decisions1, with behavioural science increasingly part of this process2. In April 2020, an influential paper3 proposed 19 policy recommendations (‘claims’) detailing how evidence from behavioural science could contribute to efforts to reduce impacts and end the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we assess 747 pandemic-related research articles that empirically investigated those claims. We report the scale of evidence and whether evidence supports them to indicate applicability for policymaking. Two independent teams, involving 72 reviewers, found evidence for 18 of 19 claims, with both teams finding evidence supporting 16 (89%) of those 18 claims. The strongest evidence supported claims that anticipated culture, polarization and misinformation would be associated with policy effectiveness. Claims suggesting trusted leaders and positive social norms increased adherence to behavioural interventions also had strong empirical support, as did appealing to social consensus or bipartisan agreement. Targeted language in messaging yielded mixed effects and there were no effects for highlighting individual benefits or protecting others. No available evidence existed to assess any distinct differences in effects between using the terms ‘physical distancing’ and ‘social distancing’. Analysis of 463 papers containing data showed generally large samples; 418 involved human participants with a mean of 16,848 (median of 1,699). That statistical power underscored improved suitability of behavioural science research for informing policy decisions. Furthermore, by implementing a standardized approach to evidence selection and synthesis, we amplify broader implications for advancing scientific evidence in policy formulation and prioritization.
PB  - Nature Publishing Group
T2  - Nature
T1  - A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19
EP  - 147
SP  - 134
VL  - 625
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06840-9
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ruggeri, Kai and Stock, Friederike and Haslam, Alexander S. and Capraro, Valerio and Boggio, P. and Ellemers, N. and Cichocka, A. and Douglas, Karen  M. and Rand, David G. and van der Linden, Sander and Cikara, Mina and Finkel, Eli J. and Druckman, James N. and Wohl, Michael J.A. and Petty, Richard E. and Tucker, Joshua A. and Shariff, Azim and Gelfand, M. and Packer, Dominic and Jetten, Jolanda and Van Lange, Paul AM and Pennycook, Gordon and Peters, Ellen and Baicker, Katherine and Crum, Alia and Weeden, Kim A and Napper, Lucy and Tabri, Nassim and Zaki, Jamil and Skitka, Linda and Kitayama, Shinobu and Mobbs, Dean and Sunstein, Cass R and Ashcroft Jones, Sarah and Todsen, Anna Louise and Hajian, Ali and Verra, Sanne and Buehler, Vanessa and Friedemann, Maja and Hecht, Marlene and Mobarak, Rayyan S and Karakasheva, Ralitsa and Tunte, Markus R and Yeung, Siu Kit and Rosenbaum, R Shayna and Lep, Žan and Yamada, Yuki and Hudson, Sa-Kiera Tiarra Jolynn and Macchia, Lucia and Soboleva, Irina and Dimant, Eugen and Geiger, Sandra J. and Jarke, Hannes and Wingen, Tobias and Berkessel, Jana B and Mareva, Silvana and McGill, Lucy and Papa, Francesca and Veckalov, Bojana and Afif, Zeina and Buabang, Eike K and Landman, Marna and Tavera, Felice and Andrews, Jack L. and Bursalioglu, Asli and Zupan, Zorana and Wagner, Lisa and Navajas, Joaquin and Vranka, Marek and Kasdan, David and Chen, Patricia and Hudson, Kathleen R and Novak, Lindsay M and Teas, Paul and Rachev, Nikolay R and Galizzi, Matteo M and Milknan, Katherine L and Petrović, Marija and van Bavel, Jay J and Willer, Robb",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Scientific evidence regularly guides policy decisions1, with behavioural science increasingly part of this process2. In April 2020, an influential paper3 proposed 19 policy recommendations (‘claims’) detailing how evidence from behavioural science could contribute to efforts to reduce impacts and end the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we assess 747 pandemic-related research articles that empirically investigated those claims. We report the scale of evidence and whether evidence supports them to indicate applicability for policymaking. Two independent teams, involving 72 reviewers, found evidence for 18 of 19 claims, with both teams finding evidence supporting 16 (89%) of those 18 claims. The strongest evidence supported claims that anticipated culture, polarization and misinformation would be associated with policy effectiveness. Claims suggesting trusted leaders and positive social norms increased adherence to behavioural interventions also had strong empirical support, as did appealing to social consensus or bipartisan agreement. Targeted language in messaging yielded mixed effects and there were no effects for highlighting individual benefits or protecting others. No available evidence existed to assess any distinct differences in effects between using the terms ‘physical distancing’ and ‘social distancing’. Analysis of 463 papers containing data showed generally large samples; 418 involved human participants with a mean of 16,848 (median of 1,699). That statistical power underscored improved suitability of behavioural science research for informing policy decisions. Furthermore, by implementing a standardized approach to evidence selection and synthesis, we amplify broader implications for advancing scientific evidence in policy formulation and prioritization.",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
journal = "Nature",
title = "A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19",
pages = "147-134",
volume = "625",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06840-9"
}

Ruggeri, K., Stock, F., Haslam, A. S., Capraro, V., Boggio, P., Ellemers, N., Cichocka, A., Douglas, Karen  M., Rand, D. G., van der Linden, S., Cikara, M., Finkel, E. J., Druckman, J. N., Wohl, M. J.A., Petty, R. E., Tucker, J. A., Shariff, A., Gelfand, M., Packer, D., Jetten, J., Van Lange, P. A., Pennycook, G., Peters, E., Baicker, K., Crum, A., Weeden, K. A., Napper, L., Tabri, N., Zaki, J., Skitka, L., Kitayama, S., Mobbs, D., Sunstein, C. R., Ashcroft Jones, S., Todsen, A. L., Hajian, A., Verra, S., Buehler, V., Friedemann, M., Hecht, M., Mobarak, R. S., Karakasheva, R., Tunte, M. R., Yeung, S. K., Rosenbaum, R. S., Lep, Ž., Yamada, Y., Hudson, S. T. J., Macchia, L., Soboleva, I., Dimant, E., Geiger, S. J., Jarke, H., Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., Mareva, S., McGill, L., Papa, F., Veckalov, B., Afif, Z., Buabang, E. K., Landman, M., Tavera, F., Andrews, J. L., Bursalioglu, A., Zupan, Z., Wagner, L., Navajas, J., Vranka, M., Kasdan, D., Chen, P., Hudson, K. R., Novak, L. M., Teas, P., Rachev, N. R., Galizzi, M. M., Milknan, K. L., Petrović, M., van Bavel, J. J.,& Willer, R.. (2023). A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19. in Nature
Nature Publishing Group., 625, 134-147.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06840-9

Ruggeri K, Stock F, Haslam AS, Capraro V, Boggio P, Ellemers N, Cichocka A, Douglas, Karen  M., Rand DG, van der Linden S, Cikara M, Finkel EJ, Druckman JN, Wohl MJ, Petty RE, Tucker JA, Shariff A, Gelfand M, Packer D, Jetten J, Van Lange PA, Pennycook G, Peters E, Baicker K, Crum A, Weeden KA, Napper L, Tabri N, Zaki J, Skitka L, Kitayama S, Mobbs D, Sunstein CR, Ashcroft Jones S, Todsen AL, Hajian A, Verra S, Buehler V, Friedemann M, Hecht M, Mobarak RS, Karakasheva R, Tunte MR, Yeung SK, Rosenbaum RS, Lep Ž, Yamada Y, Hudson STJ, Macchia L, Soboleva I, Dimant E, Geiger SJ, Jarke H, Wingen T, Berkessel JB, Mareva S, McGill L, Papa F, Veckalov B, Afif Z, Buabang EK, Landman M, Tavera F, Andrews JL, Bursalioglu A, Zupan Z, Wagner L, Navajas J, Vranka M, Kasdan D, Chen P, Hudson KR, Novak LM, Teas P, Rachev NR, Galizzi MM, Milknan KL, Petrović M, van Bavel JJ, Willer R. A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19. in Nature. 2023;625:134-147.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06840-9 .

Ruggeri, Kai, Stock, Friederike, Haslam, Alexander S., Capraro, Valerio, Boggio, P., Ellemers, N., Cichocka, A., Douglas, Karen  M., Rand, David G., van der Linden, Sander, Cikara, Mina, Finkel, Eli J., Druckman, James N., Wohl, Michael J.A., Petty, Richard E., Tucker, Joshua A., Shariff, Azim, Gelfand, M., Packer, Dominic, Jetten, Jolanda, Van Lange, Paul AM, Pennycook, Gordon, Peters, Ellen, Baicker, Katherine, Crum, Alia, Weeden, Kim A, Napper, Lucy, Tabri, Nassim, Zaki, Jamil, Skitka, Linda, Kitayama, Shinobu, Mobbs, Dean, Sunstein, Cass R, Ashcroft Jones, Sarah, Todsen, Anna Louise, Hajian, Ali, Verra, Sanne, Buehler, Vanessa, Friedemann, Maja, Hecht, Marlene, Mobarak, Rayyan S, Karakasheva, Ralitsa, Tunte, Markus R, Yeung, Siu Kit, Rosenbaum, R Shayna, Lep, Žan, Yamada, Yuki, Hudson, Sa-Kiera Tiarra Jolynn, Macchia, Lucia, Soboleva, Irina, Dimant, Eugen, Geiger, Sandra J., Jarke, Hannes, Wingen, Tobias, Berkessel, Jana B, Mareva, Silvana, McGill, Lucy, Papa, Francesca, Veckalov, Bojana, Afif, Zeina, Buabang, Eike K, Landman, Marna, Tavera, Felice, Andrews, Jack L., Bursalioglu, Asli, Zupan, Zorana, Wagner, Lisa, Navajas, Joaquin, Vranka, Marek, Kasdan, David, Chen, Patricia, Hudson, Kathleen R, Novak, Lindsay M, Teas, Paul, Rachev, Nikolay R, Galizzi, Matteo M, Milknan, Katherine L, Petrović, Marija, van Bavel, Jay J, Willer, Robb, "A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19" in Nature, 625 (2023):134-147,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06840-9 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ruggeri, Kai
AU  - Veckalov, Bojana
AU  - Bojanić, Lana
AU  - Andersen, Thomas L.
AU  - Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah
AU  - Ayacaxli, Nelida
AU  - Barea-Arroyo, Paula
AU  - Berge, Mari Louise
AU  - Bjorndal, Ludvig D.
AU  - Bursalioglu, Asli
AU  - Buhler, Vanessa
AU  - Cadek, Martin
AU  - Cetincelik, Melis
AU  - Clay, Georgia
AU  - Cortijos-Bernabeu, Anna
AU  - Damnjanović, Kaja
AU  - Dugue, Tatianna M.
AU  - Esberg, Maya
AU  - Esteban-Serna, Celia
AU  - Felder, Ezra N.
AU  - Friedemann, Maja
AU  - Frontera-Villanueva, Darianna I.
AU  - Gale, Patricia
AU  - Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo
AU  - Geiger, Sandra J.
AU  - George, Leya
AU  - Girardello, Allegra
AU  - Gracheva, Aleksandra
AU  - Gracheva, Anastasia
AU  - Guillory, Marquis
AU  - Hecht, Marlene
AU  - Herte, Katharina
AU  - Hubena, Barbora
AU  - Ingalls, William
AU  - Jakob, Lea
AU  - Janssens, Margo
AU  - Jarke, Hannes
AU  - Kacha, Ondrej
AU  - Kalinova, Kalina Nikolova
AU  - Karakasheva, Ralitsa
AU  - Khorrami, Peggah R.
AU  - Lep, Zan
AU  - Lins, Samuel
AU  - Lofthus, Ingvild S.
AU  - Mamede, Salome
AU  - Mareva, Silvana
AU  - Mascarenhas, Mafalda F.
AU  - McGill, Lucy
AU  - Morales-Izquierdo, Sara
AU  - Moltrecht, Bettina
AU  - Mueller, Tasja S.
AU  - Musetti, Marzia
AU  - Nelsson, Joakim
AU  - Otto, Thiago
AU  - Paul, Alessandro F.
AU  - Pavlović, Irena
AU  - Petrović, Marija
AU  - Popović, Dora
AU  - Prinz, Gerhard M.
AU  - Razum, Josip
AU  - Sakelariev, Ivaylo
AU  - Samuels, Vivian
AU  - Sanguino, Ines
AU  - Say, Nicolas
AU  - Schuck, Jakob
AU  - Soysal, Irem
AU  - Todsen, Anna Louise
AU  - Tunte, Markus R.
AU  - Vidović, Milica
AU  - Vintr, Jachym
AU  - Vovko, Maja
AU  - Vranka, Marek A.
AU  - Wagner, Lisa
AU  - Wilkins, Lauren
AU  - Willems, Manou
AU  - Wisdom, Elizabeth
AU  - Yosifova, Aleksandra
AU  - Zeng, Sandy
AU  - Ahmed, Mahmoud A.
AU  - Dwarkanath, Twinkle
AU  - Cikara, Mina
AU  - Lees, Jeffrey
AU  - Folke, Tomas
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3349
AB  - Ruggeri et al. tested perceptions of opposing political party members in 10,207 participants from 26 countries. Results show that beliefs about others are overly negative but could be more realistic with transparency about actual group beliefs. Pervading global narratives suggest that political polarization is increasing, yet the accuracy of such group meta-perceptions has been drawn into question. A recent US study suggests that these beliefs are inaccurate and drive polarized beliefs about out-groups. However, it also found that informing people of inaccuracies reduces those negative beliefs. In this work, we explore whether these results generalize to other countries. To achieve this, we replicate two of the original experiments with 10,207 participants across 26 countries. We focus on local group divisions, which we refer to as fault lines. We find broad generalizability for both inaccurate meta-perceptions and reduced negative motive attribution through a simple disclosure intervention. We conclude that inaccurate and negative group meta-perceptions are exhibited in myriad contexts and that informing individuals of their misperceptions can yield positive benefits for intergroup relations. Such generalizability highlights a robust phenomenon with implications for political discourse worldwide.
PB  - Nature Research, Berlin
T2  - Nature Human Behaviour
T1  - The general fault in our fault lines
DO  - 10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ruggeri, Kai and Veckalov, Bojana and Bojanić, Lana and Andersen, Thomas L. and Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah and Ayacaxli, Nelida and Barea-Arroyo, Paula and Berge, Mari Louise and Bjorndal, Ludvig D. and Bursalioglu, Asli and Buhler, Vanessa and Cadek, Martin and Cetincelik, Melis and Clay, Georgia and Cortijos-Bernabeu, Anna and Damnjanović, Kaja and Dugue, Tatianna M. and Esberg, Maya and Esteban-Serna, Celia and Felder, Ezra N. and Friedemann, Maja and Frontera-Villanueva, Darianna I. and Gale, Patricia and Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo and Geiger, Sandra J. and George, Leya and Girardello, Allegra and Gracheva, Aleksandra and Gracheva, Anastasia and Guillory, Marquis and Hecht, Marlene and Herte, Katharina and Hubena, Barbora and Ingalls, William and Jakob, Lea and Janssens, Margo and Jarke, Hannes and Kacha, Ondrej and Kalinova, Kalina Nikolova and Karakasheva, Ralitsa and Khorrami, Peggah R. and Lep, Zan and Lins, Samuel and Lofthus, Ingvild S. and Mamede, Salome and Mareva, Silvana and Mascarenhas, Mafalda F. and McGill, Lucy and Morales-Izquierdo, Sara and Moltrecht, Bettina and Mueller, Tasja S. and Musetti, Marzia and Nelsson, Joakim and Otto, Thiago and Paul, Alessandro F. and Pavlović, Irena and Petrović, Marija and Popović, Dora and Prinz, Gerhard M. and Razum, Josip and Sakelariev, Ivaylo and Samuels, Vivian and Sanguino, Ines and Say, Nicolas and Schuck, Jakob and Soysal, Irem and Todsen, Anna Louise and Tunte, Markus R. and Vidović, Milica and Vintr, Jachym and Vovko, Maja and Vranka, Marek A. and Wagner, Lisa and Wilkins, Lauren and Willems, Manou and Wisdom, Elizabeth and Yosifova, Aleksandra and Zeng, Sandy and Ahmed, Mahmoud A. and Dwarkanath, Twinkle and Cikara, Mina and Lees, Jeffrey and Folke, Tomas",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Ruggeri et al. tested perceptions of opposing political party members in 10,207 participants from 26 countries. Results show that beliefs about others are overly negative but could be more realistic with transparency about actual group beliefs. Pervading global narratives suggest that political polarization is increasing, yet the accuracy of such group meta-perceptions has been drawn into question. A recent US study suggests that these beliefs are inaccurate and drive polarized beliefs about out-groups. However, it also found that informing people of inaccuracies reduces those negative beliefs. In this work, we explore whether these results generalize to other countries. To achieve this, we replicate two of the original experiments with 10,207 participants across 26 countries. We focus on local group divisions, which we refer to as fault lines. We find broad generalizability for both inaccurate meta-perceptions and reduced negative motive attribution through a simple disclosure intervention. We conclude that inaccurate and negative group meta-perceptions are exhibited in myriad contexts and that informing individuals of their misperceptions can yield positive benefits for intergroup relations. Such generalizability highlights a robust phenomenon with implications for political discourse worldwide.",
publisher = "Nature Research, Berlin",
journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",
title = "The general fault in our fault lines",
doi = "10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x"
}

Ruggeri, K., Veckalov, B., Bojanić, L., Andersen, T. L., Ashcroft-Jones, S., Ayacaxli, N., Barea-Arroyo, P., Berge, M. L., Bjorndal, L. D., Bursalioglu, A., Buhler, V., Cadek, M., Cetincelik, M., Clay, G., Cortijos-Bernabeu, A., Damnjanović, K., Dugue, T. M., Esberg, M., Esteban-Serna, C., Felder, E. N., Friedemann, M., Frontera-Villanueva, D. I., Gale, P., Garcia-Garzon, E., Geiger, S. J., George, L., Girardello, A., Gracheva, A., Gracheva, A., Guillory, M., Hecht, M., Herte, K., Hubena, B., Ingalls, W., Jakob, L., Janssens, M., Jarke, H., Kacha, O., Kalinova, K. N., Karakasheva, R., Khorrami, P. R., Lep, Z., Lins, S., Lofthus, I. S., Mamede, S., Mareva, S., Mascarenhas, M. F., McGill, L., Morales-Izquierdo, S., Moltrecht, B., Mueller, T. S., Musetti, M., Nelsson, J., Otto, T., Paul, A. F., Pavlović, I., Petrović, M., Popović, D., Prinz, G. M., Razum, J., Sakelariev, I., Samuels, V., Sanguino, I., Say, N., Schuck, J., Soysal, I., Todsen, A. L., Tunte, M. R., Vidović, M., Vintr, J., Vovko, M., Vranka, M. A., Wagner, L., Wilkins, L., Willems, M., Wisdom, E., Yosifova, A., Zeng, S., Ahmed, M. A., Dwarkanath, T., Cikara, M., Lees, J.,& Folke, T.. (2021). The general fault in our fault lines. in Nature Human Behaviour
Nature Research, Berlin..
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x

Ruggeri K, Veckalov B, Bojanić L, Andersen TL, Ashcroft-Jones S, Ayacaxli N, Barea-Arroyo P, Berge ML, Bjorndal LD, Bursalioglu A, Buhler V, Cadek M, Cetincelik M, Clay G, Cortijos-Bernabeu A, Damnjanović K, Dugue TM, Esberg M, Esteban-Serna C, Felder EN, Friedemann M, Frontera-Villanueva DI, Gale P, Garcia-Garzon E, Geiger SJ, George L, Girardello A, Gracheva A, Gracheva A, Guillory M, Hecht M, Herte K, Hubena B, Ingalls W, Jakob L, Janssens M, Jarke H, Kacha O, Kalinova KN, Karakasheva R, Khorrami PR, Lep Z, Lins S, Lofthus IS, Mamede S, Mareva S, Mascarenhas MF, McGill L, Morales-Izquierdo S, Moltrecht B, Mueller TS, Musetti M, Nelsson J, Otto T, Paul AF, Pavlović I, Petrović M, Popović D, Prinz GM, Razum J, Sakelariev I, Samuels V, Sanguino I, Say N, Schuck J, Soysal I, Todsen AL, Tunte MR, Vidović M, Vintr J, Vovko M, Vranka MA, Wagner L, Wilkins L, Willems M, Wisdom E, Yosifova A, Zeng S, Ahmed MA, Dwarkanath T, Cikara M, Lees J, Folke T. The general fault in our fault lines. in Nature Human Behaviour. 2021;.
doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x .

Ruggeri, Kai, Veckalov, Bojana, Bojanić, Lana, Andersen, Thomas L., Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Ayacaxli, Nelida, Barea-Arroyo, Paula, Berge, Mari Louise, Bjorndal, Ludvig D., Bursalioglu, Asli, Buhler, Vanessa, Cadek, Martin, Cetincelik, Melis, Clay, Georgia, Cortijos-Bernabeu, Anna, Damnjanović, Kaja, Dugue, Tatianna M., Esberg, Maya, Esteban-Serna, Celia, Felder, Ezra N., Friedemann, Maja, Frontera-Villanueva, Darianna I., Gale, Patricia, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Geiger, Sandra J., George, Leya, Girardello, Allegra, Gracheva, Aleksandra, Gracheva, Anastasia, Guillory, Marquis, Hecht, Marlene, Herte, Katharina, Hubena, Barbora, Ingalls, William, Jakob, Lea, Janssens, Margo, Jarke, Hannes, Kacha, Ondrej, Kalinova, Kalina Nikolova, Karakasheva, Ralitsa, Khorrami, Peggah R., Lep, Zan, Lins, Samuel, Lofthus, Ingvild S., Mamede, Salome, Mareva, Silvana, Mascarenhas, Mafalda F., McGill, Lucy, Morales-Izquierdo, Sara, Moltrecht, Bettina, Mueller, Tasja S., Musetti, Marzia, Nelsson, Joakim, Otto, Thiago, Paul, Alessandro F., Pavlović, Irena, Petrović, Marija, Popović, Dora, Prinz, Gerhard M., Razum, Josip, Sakelariev, Ivaylo, Samuels, Vivian, Sanguino, Ines, Say, Nicolas, Schuck, Jakob, Soysal, Irem, Todsen, Anna Louise, Tunte, Markus R., Vidović, Milica, Vintr, Jachym, Vovko, Maja, Vranka, Marek A., Wagner, Lisa, Wilkins, Lauren, Willems, Manou, Wisdom, Elizabeth, Yosifova, Aleksandra, Zeng, Sandy, Ahmed, Mahmoud A., Dwarkanath, Twinkle, Cikara, Mina, Lees, Jeffrey, Folke, Tomas, "The general fault in our fault lines" in Nature Human Behaviour (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x . .