Приказ основних података о документу
Emergence of complementarity and the Baconian roots of Niels Bohr's method
dc.creator | Perović, Slobodan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-12T11:45:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-12T11:45:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1355-2198 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1627 | |
dc.description.abstract | I argue that instead of a rather narrow focus on N. Bohr's account of complementarity as a particular and perhaps obscure metaphysical or epistemological concept (or as being motivated by such a concept), we should consider it to result from pursuing a particular method of studying physical phenomena. More precisely, I identify a strong undercurrent of Baconian method of induction in Bohr's work that likely emerged during his experimental training and practice. When its development is analyzed in light of Baconian induction, complementarity emerges as a levelheaded rather than a controversial account, carefully elicited from a comprehensive grasp of the available experimental basis, shunning hasty metaphysically motivated generalizations based on partial experimental evidence. In fact, Bohr's insistence on the "classical" nature of observations in experiments, as well as the counterintuitive synthesis of wave and particle concepts that have puzzled scholars, seem a natural outcome (an updated instance) of the inductive method. Such analysis clarifies the intricacies of early Schrodingers critique of the account as well as Bohr's response, which have been misinterpreted in the literature. If adequate, the analysis may lend considerable support to the view that Bacon explicated the general terms of an experimentally minded strand of the scientific method, developed and refined by scientists in the following three centuries. | en |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford | |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/179067/RS// | |
dc.rights | restrictedAccess | |
dc.source | Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics | |
dc.subject | Scientific method | en |
dc.subject | Niels Bohr | en |
dc.subject | Induction | en |
dc.subject | Francis Bacon | en |
dc.subject | Experimentalism | en |
dc.subject | Complementarity | en |
dc.title | Emergence of complementarity and the Baconian roots of Niels Bohr's method | en |
dc.type | article | |
dc.rights.license | ARR | |
dc.citation.epage | 173 | |
dc.citation.issue | 3 | |
dc.citation.other | 44(3): 162-173 | |
dc.citation.rank | M21 | |
dc.citation.spage | 162 | |
dc.citation.volume | 44 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.05.002 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84880323991 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 000324448400002 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion |